From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758695Ab2CVVHg (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:07:36 -0400 Received: from smtp.snhosting.dk ([87.238.248.203]:28038 "EHLO smtp.domainteam.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756892Ab2CVVHf (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:07:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 22:07:32 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , LKML , Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools: Add Makefile.lib Message-ID: <20120322210732.GA21154@merkur.ravnborg.org> References: <1332435713-32143-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> <1332435713-32143-2-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1332435713-32143-2-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 06:01:52PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > From: Borislav Petkov > > Put generic enough build settings which could be reused by other tools > into a common Makefile.lib file. I assume that the reason to use the filename "Makefile.lib" is that scripts/Makefile.lib uses the same extension. But whoever idiot(*) that decided to use that extension deserve to be shot! It is not a library per see, it is just a bunch of stuff you include in another makefile. So Makefile.include would be better - and as an added benefit vim does not barf on it. (*) I actually shave him quite often... Sam