From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756579Ab2CZUdk (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:33:40 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:36542 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756257Ab2CZUdj (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:33:39 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] firmware_class: Fix problems with usermodehelper test Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 22:37:49 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/3.3.0+; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd , Linus Torvalds , Saravana Kannan , Kay Sievers , Christian Lamparter , "Srivatsa S. Bhat" , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Linux PM mailing list References: <201203032122.36745.chunkeey@googlemail.com> <201203260000.34377.rjw@sisk.pl> <20120326184217.GC29332@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20120326184217.GC29332@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201203262237.49735.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, March 26, 2012, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:00:34AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > The following series of patches fixes two problems with > > request_firmware() and request_firmware_nowait() resulting from commit > > a144c6a6c924aa1da04dd77fb84b89927354fdff > > > > PM: Print a warning if firmware is requested when tasks are frozen > > > > The first problem is that request_firmware_nowait() may fail if it happens > > to run in parallel with system suspend. It should't fail in such situations > > and that is addressed by the first three patches (that code has been discussed > > with Linus at al already). > > > > The second issue is that request_firmware() may be called in a thread which > > isn't related to system suspend and if suspend happens exactly at that time, > > request_firmware() will fail (and print a scary warning), although it shouldn't. > > This problem is addressed by the remaining three patches, which are new. > > At first glance, they all look good to me, thanks for doing this work: > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Thanks! > I'm guessing this will go in through one of your trees, right? That's correct. Thanks, Rafael