From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758723Ab2C1U7w (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:59:52 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:56473 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752267Ab2C1U7v (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:59:51 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:58:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20120328.165844.660501464236484620.davem@davemloft.net> To: kaffeemonster@googlemail.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, matt@ozlabs.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][PATCH] bpf_jit drops the ball on indirect negative mem references From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mew version 6.4 on Emacs 23.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (shards.monkeyblade.net [198.137.202.13]); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:58:46 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Please do not post patches as octet-stream attachments, post them inline so that: 1) People can more easily review and quote the code in replies. 2) It actually gets logged properly in patchwork. Otherwise I can guarentee your patch will get less attention than you would like. Thanks.