From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758766Ab2C1VqH (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:46:07 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:56824 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758278Ab2C1VqE (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:46:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:45:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20120328.174559.650861844028495880.davem@davemloft.net> To: mroos@linux.ee Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: suspicious RCU usage warnings in 3.3.0 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mew version 6.4 on Emacs 23.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (shards.monkeyblade.net [198.137.202.13]); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:46:01 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Meelis Roos Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:45:48 +0300 (EEST) > Is this the same RCU problem that was fixed after 3.3 (fix a potential > rcu_read_lock() imbalance in rt6_fill_node())? My problem does not seem > to be ipv6-only, most traces are from IPv6 but some for ip. It's hard to say because the ipv6 RCU problem causes the warning to trigger somewhere away from the ipv6 code that had the RCU locking bug. We essentially return back into userspace with the RCU lock held, so the next time we go into the kernel for that thread and do RCU locking is when we'll notice the problem.