From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758064Ab2C1KoN (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:44:13 -0400 Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk ([81.2.110.251]:49873 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757831Ab2C1KoM (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:44:12 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:46:27 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Ingo Molnar , Josh Boyer , Andrew Morton , Stephen Hemminger , Len Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] floppy: revert floppy disable halt warning Message-ID: <20120328114627.51b64541@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <4F72BBCE.1060307@zytor.com> References: <20120311093853.04f049c2@s6510.linuxnetplumber.net> <20120327162633.654c8d7e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20120328064008.GA12735@gmail.com> <4F72BBCE.1060307@zytor.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:20:46 -0700 "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > On 03/27/2012 11:40 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > No objections from me. > > > > Please resubmit against latest -tip, we unified the idle > > routines which likely interacts with that patch. > > > > To the best of my knowledge, no-hlt only existed because of flaky power > distributions on 386/486 systems which were sold to run DOS. Since DOS > did no power management of any kind, including HLT, the power draw was > fairly uniform; when exposed to the much higher noise levels you got > when Linux used HLT caused some of these systems to fail. Also for the Cyrix 5510 which tended to go castors up if a HLT occurred during a DMA cycle and on a few other boxes HLT during DMA tended to go astray. Do we care ? I doubt it. The 5510 was pretty obscure, the 5520 fixed it, the 5530 is probably the oldest still in any kind of use. Alan