From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
arm@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 1/5] ARM: cleanups of io includes
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:28:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120328192816.GD22414@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMjwZOON9kFNvaEq8QhSvjAgsJT_J1Ysb9-AbePd6g+-rQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 02:05:50AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:13:58AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> >> Rob Herring has done a sweeping change cleaning up all of the mach/io.h includes,
> >> moving some of the oft-repeated macros to a common location and removing a bunch of
> >> boiler plate. This is another step closer to a common zImage for multiple platforms.
> >
> > NAK. Linus, do not pull this. This breaks PXA compilation, which has
> > been known about for more than a week.
>
> The branch contains fixes for the compilation failures, they were
> pulled in right before I staged the tag for the pull request:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=133272592723334
>
> If you prefer to let it sit in linux-next for a day or two before
> going in, that's fine. But I verified that the original build problem
> introduced was fixed before I sent it out.
Right, having merged the latest arm-soc tree this evening into the build
tree and forced a rebuild, the errors induced by Rob's patches are now
gone, so I'm fine with this going in now.
> Unfortunately, PXA is also broken due to the regulator changes
> mentioned in the above referenced mail, which is already upstream and
> unrelated to the changes in this branch.
Yes, I noticed that appearing when I updated the build tree on the 27th.
Not impressed by that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-28 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-28 7:13 [GIT PULL 0/5] Second batch of arm-soc changes Olof Johansson
2012-03-28 7:13 ` [GIT PULL 1/5] ARM: cleanups of io includes Olof Johansson
2012-03-28 8:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-28 9:05 ` Olof Johansson
2012-03-28 12:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-28 19:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2012-03-30 0:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-30 0:27 ` Olof Johansson
2012-03-30 0:34 ` Olof Johansson
2012-03-28 7:13 ` [GIT PULL 2/5] ARM: More SoC driver updates Olof Johansson
2012-03-28 7:14 ` [GIT PULL 3/5] ARM: More SoC support updates Olof Johansson
2012-03-28 7:14 ` [GIT PULL 4/5] ARM: More device tree " Olof Johansson
2012-03-28 19:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-28 20:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-28 7:14 ` [GIT PULL 5/5] drivers/clk: common clock framework Olof Johansson
2012-03-28 14:26 ` [GIT PULL 0/5] Second batch of arm-soc changes Rob Herring
2012-03-28 14:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120328192816.GD22414@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome