From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Ivo Sieben <meltedpianoman@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-v3] Support M95040 SPI EEPROM
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 09:59:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120404075956.GB9073@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMSQXEHpjD7LWQkKWJOU=9eFYqsaJi-xHFTxexQr7yoKiCG7HQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1140 bytes --]
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:21:57AM +0200, Ivo Sieben wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Op 3 april 2012 19:17 heeft Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de> het
> volgende geschreven:
> >
> >> > > > +#define EE_INSTR_BIT3_IS_ADDR 0x0010
> >> > >
> >> > > Is there some guarantee that this chip flag will always have this
> >> > > meaning?
> >> >
> >> > ? This is a driver flag.
> >>
> >> Sorry, I don't see it set anywhere, so unclear on where it comes from.
> >> I thought it was from a generic spi probe.
> >
> > Yeah, agreed, 'struct spi_eeprom' does not sound much like platform_data :/
> > Thanks for checking.
>
> The flag is indeed used in the platform initialization to enable the
> "address bit" behavior, so you don't see it set anywhere in this patch
> (and not anywhere in the kernel, since no board uses this flag yet).
>
> Is it OK if we leave this patch like this?
Yes. This is a useful extension and there will be boards using it.
Thanks,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-04 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-03 6:25 Ivo Sieben
2012-04-03 16:46 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-03 16:53 ` Chris Wright
2012-04-03 17:07 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-03 17:11 ` Chris Wright
2012-04-03 17:17 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-04 7:21 ` Ivo Sieben
2012-04-04 7:59 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2012-04-05 15:11 ` Ivo Sieben
2012-04-05 16:43 ` Greg KH
2012-04-06 8:16 ` Remy Bohmer
2012-04-06 18:22 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-17 14:43 ` Ivo Sieben
2012-04-17 20:47 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120404075956.GB9073@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=meltedpianoman@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®