From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755300Ab2DGTSa (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Apr 2012 15:18:30 -0400 Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk ([81.2.110.251]:47491 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752875Ab2DGTS3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Apr 2012 15:18:29 -0400 Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 20:20:56 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Al Viro , Konstantin Khlebnikov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kay Sievers , Sukadev Bhattiprolu Subject: Re: RFC: deprecating/removing the legacy mode of devpts Message-ID: <20120407202056.472d8ad9@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <4F80892A.7050104@zytor.com> References: <4F80892A.7050104@zytor.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 11:36:26 -0700 "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > Currently, devpts supports a legacy mode where only one instance exists. > For backwards compatibility, this is also the default mode, but the > right thing should be to migrate everyone over to the "newinstance" scheme. > > However, it is increasingly clear that that is not happening; neither > the distros nor udev support this by default at this point. Well maybe thats because the legacy mode works perfectly well for most purposes and does what they want. The "non-legacy" mode is really not "non-legacy" its "special case extra funkiness". With my tty hat on I'd prefer to keep it indefinitely if need be. It's hardly a maintainability issue or a hot problem. We've got much bigger turds to juggle than that. I don't see why we need an agendum to force the users into making changes that really don't matter. I mean we still support BSD ptys 8) Alan