From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756095Ab2DHWQS (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Apr 2012 18:16:18 -0400 Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk ([81.2.110.251]:41112 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755479Ab2DHWQR (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Apr 2012 18:16:17 -0400 Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 23:18:41 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Konstantin Khlebnikov Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Al Viro , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kay Sievers , Sukadev Bhattiprolu Subject: Re: RFC: deprecating/removing the legacy mode of devpts Message-ID: <20120408231841.42e28867@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <4F81D5C4.9000503@openvz.org> References: <4F80892A.7050104@zytor.com> <4F81D5C4.9000503@openvz.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > As such, I would like to suggest the following: > > > > 1. For 3.5, add this to feature-removal.txt. > > 2. For 3.6, remove CONFIG_DEVPTS_MULTIPLE_INSTANCES as a configuration > > option, and printk a warning if devpts is mounted without the > > "newinstance" option. > > 3. For 3.9 remove the legacy support including support for a ptmx node > > outside the devpts filesystem. Ok I'm putting my tty maintainers hat on at this point because nobody seems to be listening I'm NAKking this change, I'm NAKking the feature-removal change. If you want this to change convince the distributions there is a point in supporting it. This is the *wrong* forum to force a cornercase feature onto a bazillion users, and the wrong way to strongarm maintainers of the relevant user space. If udev has a problem handling it nicely because of the way the link is generated then *fix that problem* so udev automatically gets both cases right. If need be we can add more messages to udev to tell it what is expected and what devtmpfs should produce. Alan