From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752018Ab2DJJAE (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 05:00:04 -0400 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:57744 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751021Ab2DJJAC (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 05:00:02 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:59:56 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: "Turquette, Mike" Cc: Mike Turquette , Arnd Bergman , Rob Herring , Andrew Lunn , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: common clk: fix clk_register_fixed_rate() under memory pressure Message-ID: <20120410085956.GA24465@sirena.org.uk> References: <20120405084808.GA21060@glitch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Power is poison. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 02:52:15PM -0700, Turquette, Mike wrote: > Thanks for the patch Domenico. I did a big cleanup of the > registration code for all of the basic clock types and a fix for this > has already been rolled in to that branch, so I won't be taking this > patch. I'll Cc you on the fixes when I send them to the list > (probably tomorrow). Would it be possible for you to keep a tree in -next? There's been several people sending patches like this which have been superceeded by your work and this might help avoid such duplicated work.