From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758904Ab2DJOgj (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:36:39 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f52.google.com ([209.85.210.52]:60532 "EHLO mail-pz0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754471Ab2DJOgi (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:36:38 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:36:33 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Linus Walleij Cc: Linus Walleij , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rabin Vincent Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: always handle dpm_order Message-ID: <20120410143633.GB14703@kroah.com> References: <1331805498-12903-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> <20120315154323.GB23589@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:51:35PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:58:18AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> From: Rabin Vincent > >> > >> If !dev->class, device_move() does not respect the dpm_order. > >> Fix it to do so. > > > > Is there code today in the kernel that needs this to go in now?  For > > older releases?  Or is 3.4 acceptable? > > To me it seems it has not been merged to 3.4 yet ... can we have it > for the -rc:s? Does it fix a bug somewhere? If so, sure, but I didn't get the impression that it did, and as it came after the merge window, I was going to wait. If this is incorrect, please let me know. thanks, greg k-h