From: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>
To: mingo@elte.hu
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org,
fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
giancarlo.asnaghi@st.com, alan@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] x86: introduce CONFIG_X86_DEV_DMA_OPS
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:19:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120411101947.GA14244@mail.gnudd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120314065614.GB27480@elte.hu>
Alessandro Rubini:
>> 32-bit x86 systems may need their own DMA operations, so add a
>> new config option, which is turned on for 64-bit systems. This
>> patch has no functional effect but it paves the way for
>> supporting the STA2x11 I/O Hub and possibly other chips.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>
>> Acked-by: Giancarlo Asnaghi <giancarlo.asnaghi@st.com>
>> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/Kconfig | 5 +++++
>> arch/x86/include/asm/device.h | 4 ++--
>> arch/x86/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Ingo Molnar:
> Ok, the whole series looks pretty clean, modulo a few mostly
> cosmetic details in the driver itself.
>
> Andrew, you are typically merging dma-mapping.h patches, would
> you like to do these, or can we do it in tip:x86/platform?
>
> It would also be nice if the gents on Cc: would voice objections
> or approval, if any.
Any news? My next version (V5) I sent on Apr 4th is still working with
today's next, but I got no ack nor nack.
thanks
/alessandro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-11 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-13 7:28 [PATCH V4 0/3] *** SUBJECT HERE *** Alessandro Rubini
2012-03-13 7:30 ` [PATCH V4 1/3] x86: introduce CONFIG_X86_DEV_DMA_OPS Alessandro Rubini
2012-03-14 6:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-04-12 18:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-12 20:15 ` Alessandro Rubini
2012-04-12 20:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-12 20:32 ` Alessandro Rubini
2012-04-12 20:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-14 11:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-04-11 10:19 ` Alessandro Rubini [this message]
2012-03-13 7:30 ` [PATCH V4 2/3] x86: introduce CONFIG_X86_DMA_REMAP Alessandro Rubini
2012-03-13 7:30 ` [PATCH V4 3/3] x86/PCI: initial support for sta2x11 I/O hub Alessandro Rubini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120411101947.GA14244@mail.gnudd.com \
--to=rubini@gnudd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=giancarlo.asnaghi@st.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome