From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762223Ab2DLI4c (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 04:56:32 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:48257 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754010Ab2DLI43 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 04:56:29 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:56:28 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer To: Mike Turquette Cc: arnd.bergmann@linaro.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, patches@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] common clk framework misc fixes Message-ID: <20120412085628.GE20478@pengutronix.de> References: <1334192572-12499-1-git-send-email-mturquette@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1334192572-12499-1-git-send-email-mturquette@linaro.org> X-Sent-From: Pengutronix Hildesheim X-URL: http://www.pengutronix.de/ X-IRC: #ptxdist @freenode X-Accept-Language: de,en X-Accept-Content-Type: text/plain X-Uptime: 10:53:38 up 151 days, 16:40, 67 users, load average: 0.10, 0.21, 0.48 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:21e:67ff:fe11:9c5c X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sha@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 06:02:38PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: > This series collects many of the fixes posted for the recently merged > common clock framework as well as some general clean-up. Most of the > code classifies as a clean-up moreso than a bug fix; hopefully this is > not a problem since the common clk framework is new code pulled for 3.4. > > Patches are based on v3.4-rc2 and can be pulled from: > git://git.linaro.org/people/mturquette/linux.git v3.4-rc2-clk-fixes > > Please let me know I missed any critical fixes that were posted to the > list already. > > Arnd & Olof, if there are no objections to these changes can this get > pulled through the arm-soc tree? I had a look at this series and except for the comment Shawn already made I am fine with it. I also vote for queuing it during -rc since the framework currently has no users and letting it into -rc will help people like me putting SoC support onto it. Except the last patch: Acked-by: Sascha Hauer Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |