From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761922Ab2DLNMO (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:12:14 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:57295 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752380Ab2DLNMN (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:12:13 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:11:59 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Mike Turquette , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] common clk framework misc fixes Message-ID: <20120412131155.GI2445@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> References: <1334192572-12499-1-git-send-email-mturquette@linaro.org> <201204121114.38825.arnd.bergmann@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201204121114.38825.arnd.bergmann@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:14:38AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 12 April 2012, Mike Turquette wrote: > > This series collects many of the fixes posted for the recently merged > > common clock framework as well as some general clean-up. Most of the > > code classifies as a clean-up moreso than a bug fix; hopefully this is > > not a problem since the common clk framework is new code pulled for 3.4. > > > > Patches are based on v3.4-rc2 and can be pulled from: > > git://git.linaro.org/people/mturquette/linux.git v3.4-rc2-clk-fixes > > > > Please let me know I missed any critical fixes that were posted to the > > list already. > > > > Arnd & Olof, if there are no objections to these changes can this get > > pulled through the arm-soc tree? > > I think pulling it in through the arm-soc tree is still ok, but it's > borderline because of the size and patch 13 is probably too big, > in addition to the comments that were made there. > > Let's pull patches 1 through 12 in to a separate series that we don't > mix with the other bug fixes. Mike, please send a pull request with the > Acks added in. > I just appended 3 more patches to the series. Patches #1 and #2 change the interface between clk core and clk drivers - clk_ops a little bit, (this is something Mike acked a couple of weeks ago, but missed from the series) and patch #3 is a critical bug fix. So unless we can send the whole series for -rc, I'd vote we send none of them for -rc. Instead, we can stabilize it somewhere and ask all the clk driver porting base on that. Sending part of the cleanup/fixup and leaving the other that could require changes on clk drivers out is a bad idea to me. -- Regards, Shawn