From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, paulus@samba.org,
eranian@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, efault@gmx.de,
peterz@infradead.org, namhyung@gmail.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
dsahern@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] perf ui annotate browser: Allow toggling addr offset view
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:59:21 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120414005921.GA22114@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxnv5Wrix=uREQsEg+tSBE8SFvy0v_76csv3hrnmPYG2A@mail.gmail.com>
Em Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:25:50AM -0700, Linus Torvalds escreveu:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:07 AM, tip-bot for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> <acme@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > The offset view will be the default as soon as operations that deal with
> > offsets in a function are handled accodringly, i.e. in offset view the
> > above will become:
> >
> > 2f: jne __list_del_entry+0x84
> > <SNIP>
> > 84: mov %rdi,%rcx
>
> Oh, please please please make this happen.
I will in the next days. Glad you like it.
> Also, if at all possible, please mark offsets that are referenced by a
> branch some way. I do think that the "size of instruction" can be a
> very valid piece of information when looking at instruction-level
> profiles, but quite frankly, I'm also 100% sure that the fact that an
> instruction is a branch target is *more* important.
>
> Now, fancy arrows etc might be too hard to do (especially without
> cluttering things up too much), but marking just the targets would
> already be lovely. IOW, turn this mess:
>
>
> : ffffffff810d7e80 <kmem_cache_free>:
> 1.91 : ffffffff810d7e80: push %rbp
> 0.05 : ffffffff810d7e81: mov %rsp,%rbp
> 2.02 : ffffffff810d7e84: push %r12
> 0.00 : ffffffff810d7e86: mov %rdi,%r12
> 0.55 : ffffffff810d7e89: push %rbx
> 0.00 : ffffffff810d7e8a: mov %rsi,%rdi
> 1.20 : ffffffff810d7e8d: mov %rsi,%rbx
> 1.64 : ffffffff810d7e90: callq ffffffff8102a730 <__phys_addr>
> 0.05 : ffffffff810d7e95: movabs $0xffffea0000000000,%rdi
> 0.22 : ffffffff810d7e9f: shr $0xc,%rax
> 0.11 : ffffffff810d7ea3: shl $0x6,%rax
> 1.64 : ffffffff810d7ea7: lea (%rax,%rdi,1),%rdi
> 42.80 : ffffffff810d7eab: mov (%rdi),%rax
> 2.02 : ffffffff810d7eae: test $0x80,%ah
> 0.00 : ffffffff810d7eb1: jne ffffffff810d7ef6
> <kmem_cache_free+0x76>
> 0.22 : ffffffff810d7eb3: mov 0x8(%rbp),%r9
> 7.14 : ffffffff810d7eb7: mov (%r12),%rax
> 0.65 : ffffffff810d7ebb: add %gs:0xcb88,%rax
> 4.58 : ffffffff810d7ec4: mov 0x8(%rax),%rdx
>
> (which has tons of unnecessary white-space too - shades of G+) into
Grin ;-)
Yeah, even the : column isn't needed I think.
> <kmem_cache_free>:
> 1.91 : push %rbp
> 0.05 : mov %rsp,%rbp
> 2.02 : push %r12
> 0.00 : mov %rdi,%r12
> 0.55 : push %rbx
> 0.00 : mov %rsi,%rdi
> 1.20 : mov %rsi,%rbx
> 1.64 : callq ffffffff8102a730 <__phys_addr>
> 0.05 : movabs $0xffffea0000000000,%rdi
> 0.22 : shr $0xc,%rax
> 0.11 : shl $0x6,%rax
> 1.64 : lea (%rax,%rdi,1),%rdi
> 42.80 : mov (%rdi),%rax
> 2.02 : test $0x80,%ah
> 0.00 : jne kmem_cache_free+0x76
> 0.22 : 0x33: mov 0x8(%rbp),%r9
> 7.14 : 0x37: mov (%r12),%rax
> 0.65 : add %gs:0xcb88,%rax
> 4.58 : mov 0x8(%rax),%rdx
> ....
>
> or something. I think the "callq ffffffff8102a730 <__phys_addr>"
> could also be prettified with *zero* downside.
Yeah, no need to see the address in default mode.
> Sure, leave some magic keycombination to get the "full information", but ..
Yeah, we have o to toggle offset view + s to toggle source code view,
etc.
> Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-14 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-13 18:07 tip-bot for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-04-13 18:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-13 18:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-14 1:04 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-04-14 8:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-04-14 16:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-04-16 6:25 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-04-16 15:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-16 15:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-18 0:43 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-04-15 10:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-14 0:59 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2012-04-14 8:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-04-14 16:26 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-04-15 5:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-04-15 6:57 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120414005921.GA22114@infradead.org \
--to=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®