From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755562Ab2DNMCQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Apr 2012 08:02:16 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:63440 "EHLO mail-we0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754952Ab2DNMCO (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Apr 2012 08:02:14 -0400 Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:02:08 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: NeilBrown , Jim Kukunas , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: arch/86: AVX RAID5 xor checksumming Message-ID: <20120414120208.GI24688@gmail.com> References: <1334078551-6859-1-git-send-email-james.t.kukunas@linux.intel.com> <4F846FBC.9060503@zytor.com> <20120411061442.2f839c77@notabene.brown> <4F84A40E.8040907@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F84A40E.8040907@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 04/10/2012 01:14 PM, NeilBrown wrote: > >> > >> I think this (and the SSSE3 patches for RAID-6) should go in via the > >> RAID tree. Neil, do you agree? > > > > I'm happy to take the SSSE3 RAID-6 patches as they only affect lib/raid6, but > > I felt that this one - being purely in arch/x86 - should probably go via the > > x86 tree. > > However I'm flexible and if you (collectively) are happy with these patches > > going in through my tree, I'll do that. > > > > Go ahead and take them with my Acked-by: -- I think that's easier. Yeah - and x86/include/asm/xor*.h should probably be renamed raid_xor*.h or so, to make this really obvious to do in the future. Thanks, Ingo