On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 07:12:30PM +0530, Ashish Chavan wrote:

> Thanks for bearing with me Mark. But the only other way I can think is
> to make the *extra* info like master/slave and fs a part of array itself
> and then search through the array to get required divisors. In this
> case, every time I need to search through entire array to pick up
> correct divisors. Wouldn't that be inefficient, especially when the
> array indexes are fixed? Or the readability/maintainability of that
> would outweigh slight performance overhead?

If there is a genuine performance concern there's plenty of other ways
to do it which would make it run faster.