From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>,
Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>, David Smith <dsmith@redhat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] cred: change keyctl_session_to_parent() to use task_work_add()
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:40:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120419184013.GA31862@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120419181010.GA29793@redhat.com>
On 04/19, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 04/19, David Howells wrote:
> >
> > Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > But I certainly do not want to put these changes in 3/3 or in this series.
> >
> > Why not? It seems the correct place for them.
>
> I wanted to discuss the functional changes first, then send the trivial
> cleanups. And the changes in arch/ are always painful. And, "remove
> tracehook_notify_resume" is a bit off-topic, but I do not want to change
> the same code in arch/ twice.
That said, if you do not agree with 3/3 without "remove the call sites",
I'll send v6 which doesn't rename key_replace_session_keyring() but
updates the old callers:
arch/alpha/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/arm/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/avr32/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/blackfin/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/c6x/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/cris/kernel/ptrace.c | 2 -
arch/frv/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/h8300/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/hexagon/kernel/signal.c | 3 +-
arch/ia64/kernel/process.c | 2 -
arch/m32r/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/mips/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/s390/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/sh/kernel/signal_32.c | 2 -
arch/sh/kernel/signal_64.c | 2 -
arch/sparc/kernel/signal_32.c | 2 -
arch/sparc/kernel/signal_64.c | 2 -
arch/tile/kernel/process.c | 2 -
arch/unicore32/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
arch/x86/kernel/signal.c | 2 -
include/linux/key.h | 4 --
include/linux/sched.h | 2 -
kernel/cred.c | 9 -----
security/keys/internal.h | 2 +
security/keys/keyctl.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------
security/keys/process_keys.c | 20 ++++-------
30 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 114 deletions(-)
I am not going to argue, but honestly I don't think it is a good
idea to mix the functional changes in keyctl.c and the simple
(but obviously untested) cleanups.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-19 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-14 2:12 [PATCH v4 0/3] task_work_add (was: task_work_queue) Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-14 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] task_work_add: generic process-context callbacks Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-14 2:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-14 3:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-14 3:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-14 8:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-14 20:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-17 13:53 ` David Howells
2012-04-17 16:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-14 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] genirq: reimplement exit_irq_thread() hook via task_work_add() Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-14 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] cred: change keyctl_session_to_parent() to use task_work_add() Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-14 2:32 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] task_work_add (was: task_work_queue) Linus Torvalds
2012-04-14 3:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-14 18:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-14 20:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-17 14:11 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] genirq: reimplement exit_irq_thread() hook via task_work_add() David Howells
2012-04-17 16:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-17 14:23 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] cred: change keyctl_session_to_parent() to use task_work_add() David Howells
2012-04-17 16:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-17 19:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-19 16:52 ` David Howells
2012-04-19 17:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-19 17:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-19 17:55 ` David Howells
2012-04-19 18:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-19 18:40 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-04-19 19:34 ` David Howells
2012-04-19 19:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-19 22:26 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120419184013.GA31862@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=agordeev@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dsmith@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome