From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754388Ab2DXHCO (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 03:02:14 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:36320 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754357Ab2DXHCM (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 03:02:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 03:00:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20120424.030050.767238391336824492.davem@davemloft.net> To: sam@ravnborg.org Cc: yinghai@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, mhocko@suse.cz, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Weirdness in __alloc_bootmem_node_high From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20120424063236.GA23963@merkur.ravnborg.org> References: <20120422200554.GA6385@merkur.ravnborg.org> <20120422.220054.1961736352806510855.davem@davemloft.net> <20120424063236.GA23963@merkur.ravnborg.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.0.95 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (shards.monkeyblade.net [198.137.202.13]); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:00:54 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Sam Ravnborg Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:32:36 +0200 > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 10:00:54PM -0400, David Miller wrote: >> diff --git a/arch/sparc/Kconfig b/arch/sparc/Kconfig >> index db4e821..3763302 100644 >> --- a/arch/sparc/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/sparc/Kconfig >> @@ -109,6 +109,9 @@ config NEED_PER_CPU_EMBED_FIRST_CHUNK >> config NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK >> def_bool y if SPARC64 >> >> +config NO_BOOTMEM >> + def_bool y if SPARC64 > > mm/Kconfig define NO_BOOTMEM so you can just add a "select NO_BOOTMEM" > to SPARC64. I was merely following the lead on x86 :-) but yes it should probably be a select.