From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] gcc work-around and math128
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:10:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120424161039.293018424@chello.nl> (raw)
Hi all,
The SCHED_DEADLINE review resulted in the following three patches;
The first is a cleanup of various copies of the same GCC loop optimization
work-around. I don't think this patch is too controversial, at worst I've
picked a wrong name, but I wanted to get it out there in case people
know more sites.
The second two implement a few u128 operations so we can do 128bit math.. I
know a few people will die a little inside, but having nanosecond granularity
time accounting leads to very big numbers very quickly and when you need to
multiply them 64bit really isn't that much.
So far its just mult, add and cmp for u128, no divisions quite yet. I realize
that on 32bit archs mult_u128 will result in like 8 multiplication
instructions that's still nowhere near the most expensive thing ever.
Also, I suck at gcc inline asm, so patch 3/3 is very likely completely wrong,
in any case none of the patches has even been near a compiler and this really
is just an RFC to probe if we want to go here at all.
next reply other threads:[~2012-04-24 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-24 16:10 Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-04-24 16:10 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] kernel,sched,time: Clean up gcc work-arounds Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 19:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-25 0:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-04-24 16:10 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] math128: Introduce {mult,add,cmp}_u128 Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 19:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-24 19:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 20:12 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-04-24 21:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-25 0:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-25 1:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-25 8:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-25 10:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-25 0:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-04-25 8:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-25 11:23 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-04-25 11:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-25 14:35 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-04-25 15:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 16:10 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] math128, x86_64: Implement {mult,add}_u128 in 64bit asm Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 16:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-24 16:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 17:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-24 17:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 17:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-24 22:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 22:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-24 17:22 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/3] gcc work-around and math128 H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-24 17:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-24 21:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-04-24 21:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-24 21:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 21:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-04-24 21:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120424161039.293018424@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®