From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757452Ab2DXTvn (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:51:43 -0400
Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:45514 "EHLO
	caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1757363Ab2DXTvm (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:51:42 -0400
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:51:27 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Rob Lee <rob.lee@linaro.org>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org,
        daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>, kernel@pengutronix.de,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: imx: Add common imx cpuidle init
	functionality.
Message-ID: <20120424195127.GA3628@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <20120423062739.GX3852@pengutronix.de> <20120423065259.GR26306@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <20120423065623.GA3852@pengutronix.de> <20120423071013.GS26306@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <20120423074856.GU20478@pengutronix.de> <CAMXH7KH1pwh7hJ=T30zxcWcx19wjXvr6Ff4OLy7fzqY5p79Fwg@mail.gmail.com> <20120424013841.GB26306@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <20120424075426.GP24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120424083603.GE26306@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <CAMXH7KFMcHoGeTRcPWR_ENK2R=nU134HgjnXpFUsYJTL9pbgrQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMXH7KFMcHoGeTRcPWR_ENK2R=nU134HgjnXpFUsYJTL9pbgrQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:40:35AM -0500, Rob Lee wrote:
> Thanks for the attention on this.  From what I've understood, I will
> send another submission that includes the imx cpuidle patchset and
> Shawn's device tree late initcall patchset and I'll provide
> explanation of the two separate patchsets in the cover sheet.

What I also want to see _along with_ the addition of the init_late
callback is a patch set from the _same_ people fixing up the rest
of arch/arm/mach-* to use it - you know, like what I do when I
introduce these kinds of things.

Otherwise I'm going to NAK the change.  We can't have new stuff
introduced in this way and the older platforms ignored.  Forward
progress across the board please.