From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, mingo@elte.hu, andi@firstfloor.org,
eranian@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ming.m.lin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] perf tool: Parse general events from sysfs
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:01:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120425130142.GB3378@m.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F979002.9090906@intel.com>
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 01:47:46PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> On 04/24/2012 05:04 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > hi,
> > so the point is to have an alias support for pmu event definition.
> > Seems like good idea to improve usability/readability, I have some
> > general comments though..
> >
> Thank you very much for reviewing this.
> > - you suggest to have sysfs files having contents like:
> > event=0x2c,umask=0xf
> > when we were adding the formats stuff into sysfs, we had to cut off
> > the sysfs file contents to bare minimum to obey the sysfs rule:
> > single file = single value
> > so you might have some troubles pushing that through.. not sure ;)
> >
> > - I haven't read the whole patchset, but seems like the "events"
> > directory is now specific to a 'Intel uncore pmu'. If thats the
> > case I think there should be generic way for each pmu to define
> > this stuff.
> >
> > - as for the tools/pmu.c change I'd like to see more consistent
> > way of parsing this, than via 'newcfg' variable.. but none
> > is comming to me so far ;) I'll think about that..
> >
> For this point, how about making the parser re-entrantable like the patch
> attached below does.
yep, looks cleaner ;) some comments below
>
> Regards
> Yan, Zheng
>
> ---
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile b/tools/perf/Makefile
> index e98e14c..a8b47d2 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/perf/Makefile
> @@ -728,11 +728,13 @@ $(OUTPUT)perf.o perf.spec \
> # These two need to be here so that when O= is not used they take precedence
SNIP
> +static int __parse_events(const char *str, int *idx, struct list_head *list);
>
> #define CHW(x) .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE, .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_##x
> #define CSW(x) .type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE, .config = PERF_COUNT_SW_##x
> @@ -651,8 +653,11 @@ int parse_events_add_numeric(struct list_head *list, int *idx,
> int parse_events_add_pmu(struct list_head *list, int *idx,
> char *name, struct list_head *head_config)
> {
> + LIST_HEAD(event);
Are there all available events under ...event_source/devices/%s/events or
just some of them ?
In case of the latter, maybe the 'aliases/alias' would be better name for
that.. ending up with rename in this source ;)
> struct perf_event_attr attr;
> struct perf_pmu *pmu;
> + char *config;
> + int ret;
>
> pmu = perf_pmu__find(name);
> if (!pmu)
> @@ -666,10 +671,21 @@ int parse_events_add_pmu(struct list_head *list, int *idx,
> */
> config_attr(&attr, head_config, 0);
>
> - if (perf_pmu__config(pmu, &attr, head_config))
> - return -EINVAL;
> + ret = perf_pmu__config(pmu, &attr, head_config);
> + if (!ret)
> + return add_event(list, idx, &attr, (char *) "pmu");
> +
> + ret = perf_pmu__alias(pmu, &config, head_config);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
I think it's ok for pmu object to contain list of aliases loaded
from sysfs (if that change will go throught ;) ), but I'd rather
see the pmu alias interface to be more generic like:
config = perf_pmu__alias(pmu, alias);
The function would just return the event config string if the record
is found for the alias.
...and the parse_events_add_pmu function would then take care of
the rest.. the final 'pmu/config' string and have it parsed...
thanks,
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-25 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-01 1:41 [RFC PATCH V2 0/6] perf: Intel uncore pmu counting support Yan, Zheng
2012-04-01 1:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] perf: Export perf_assign_events Yan, Zheng
2012-04-01 1:41 ` [PATCH 2/6] perf: Generic intel uncore support Yan, Zheng
2012-04-01 1:41 ` [PATCH 3/6] perf: Add Nehalem and Sandy Bridge " Yan, Zheng
2012-04-01 1:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] perf tool: Parse general events from sysfs Yan, Zheng
2012-04-24 9:04 ` Jiri Olsa
2012-04-25 5:47 ` Yan, Zheng
2012-04-25 13:01 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2012-04-01 1:41 ` [PATCH 5/6] perf: Generic pci uncore device support Yan, Zheng
2012-04-01 1:41 ` [PATCH 6/6] perf: Add Sandy Bridge-EP uncore support Yan, Zheng
2012-04-23 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH V2 0/6] perf: Intel uncore pmu counting support Stephane Eranian
2012-04-24 8:56 ` Yan, Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120425130142.GB3378@m.brq.redhat.com \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®