From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Linux Edac Mailing List <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [EDAC PATCH v13 6/7] edac.h: Prepare to handle with generic layers
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:19:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120425171904.GM18882@aftab.osrc.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F96E1EB.1030407@redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 02:24:59PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Yes, but this seems to be hidden on some lower level layer on their
> hardware. The rank information is only an information inside their
> per-DIMM registers.
Yep, it looks like it.
[..]
> [52803.640136] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: mc#1: Node ID: 1, source ID: 1
> [52803.640141] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: Memory mirror is disabled
> [52803.640154] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: Lockstep is disabled
> [52803.640156] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: address map is on open page mode
> [52803.640157] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: Memory is unregistered
> [52803.640159] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: Channel #0 MTR0 = 500c
> [52803.640162] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: mc#1: channel 0, dimm 0, 4096 Mb (1048576 pages) bank: 8, rank: 2, row: 0x8000, col: 0x400
> [52803.640165] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: Channel #0 MTR1 = 500c
> [52803.640168] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: mc#1: channel 0, dimm 1, 4096 Mb (1048576 pages) bank: 8, rank: 2, row: 0x8000, col: 0x400
> [52803.640171] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: Channel #0 MTR2 = 0
> [52803.640174] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: Channel #1 MTR0 = 500c
> [52803.640176] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: mc#1: channel 1, dimm 0, 4096 Mb (1048576 pages) bank: 8, rank: 2, row: 0x8000, col: 0x400
> [52803.640180] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: Channel #1 MTR1 = 500c
> [52803.640182] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: mc#1: channel 1, dimm 1, 4096 Mb (1048576 pages) bank: 8, rank: 2, row: 0x8000, col: 0x400
> [52803.640185] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: Channel #1 MTR2 = 0
> [52803.640188] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: Channel #2 MTR0 = 500c
> [52803.640190] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: mc#1: channel 2, dimm 0, 4096 Mb (1048576 pages) bank: 8, rank: 2, row: 0x8000, col: 0x400
> [52803.640193] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: Channel #2 MTR1 = 500c
> [52803.640195] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: mc#1: channel 2, dimm 1, 4096 Mb (1048576 pages) bank: 8, rank: 2, row: 0x8000, col: 0x400
> [52803.640199] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: Channel #2 MTR2 = 0
> [52803.640201] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: Channel #3 MTR0 = 500c
> [52803.640203] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: mc#1: channel 3, dimm 0, 4096 Mb (1048576 pages) bank: 8, rank: 2, row: 0x8000, col: 0x400
> [52803.640218] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: Channel #3 MTR1 = 500c
> [52803.640220] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: mc#1: channel 3, dimm 1, 4096 Mb (1048576 pages) bank: 8, rank: 2, row: 0x8000, col: 0x400
Ok, this looks like output from those MC_DOD_CH{0,1,2}_{0,1,2}
registers. And those are per-channel, actually, with a NUMRANK field
which tells you how many ranks the DIMM on this channel has.
(Btw, I'm looking at the corei7 datasheet, doc# 320835-003, couldn't
find those MC_DOD*s in the xeon datasheets).
So, the channels display in edac-ctl are the 3 channels, slot{0,1,2} are the
physical slots on each channel.
Now let's look at your output from earlier:
> $ ./edac-ctl --layout
> +-----------------------------------+
> | mc0 |
> | channel0 | channel1 | channel2 |
> -------+-----------------------------------+
> slot2: | 0 MB | 0 MB | 0 MB |
> slot1: | 1024 MB | 0 MB | 0 MB |
> slot0: | 1024 MB | 1024 MB | 1024 MB |
> -------+-----------------------------------+
>
> Those are the logs that dump the Memory Controller registers:
>
> [ 115.818947] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: Ch0 phy rd0, wr0 (0x063f4031): 2 ranks, UDIMMs
it says here 2 ranks
> [ 115.818950] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: dimm 0 1024 Mb offset: 0, bank: 8, rank: 1, row: 0x4000, col: 0x400
> [ 115.818955] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: dimm 1 1024 Mb offset: 4, bank: 8, rank: 1, row: 0x4000, col: 0x400
> [ 115.818982] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: Ch1 phy rd1, wr1 (0x063f4031): 2 ranks, UDIMMs
and here 2 too although there's only one single-ranked DIMM here. So
which is it?
> [ 115.818985] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: dimm 0 1024 Mb offset: 0, bank: 8, rank: 1, row: 0x4000, col: 0x400
> [ 115.819012] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: Ch2 phy rd3, wr3 (0x063f4031): 2 ranks, UDIMMs
> [ 115.819016] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: dimm 0 1024 Mb offset: 0, bank: 8, rank: 1, row: 0x4000, col: 0x400
So, I'd say this machine has 4 DIMMs on the node, all 4 of them are
single-ranked and 2 are connected to channel0, the other two channels
have each a single DIMM of a single rank.
Looking further the i7 doc above, there are other registers like
MC_SAG_CH{0,1,2}_{0-7} which look like rank descriptors and there's
even a small pseudo-code thing which can give you the memory address by
"unwinding" the interleaving.
> [52803.640223] EDAC DEBUG: get_dimm_config: Channel #3 MTR2 = 0
> [52803.640226] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: TOLM: 3.136 GB (0x00000000c3ffffff)
> [52803.640228] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: TOHM: 66.624 GB (0x0000001043ffffff)
> [52803.640231] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: SAD#0 DRAM up to 33.792 GB (0x0000000840000000) Interleave: 8:6 reg=0x000083c3
> [52803.640234] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: SAD#0, interleave #0: 0
> [52803.640237] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: SAD#1 DRAM up to 66.560 GB (0x0000001040000000) Interleave: 8:6 reg=0x000103c3
> [52803.640239] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: SAD#1, interleave #0: 1
> [52803.640245] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: TAD#0: up to 66.560 GB (0x0000001040000000), socket interleave 0, memory interleave 3, TGT: 0, 1, 2, 3, reg=0x0040f3e4
> [52803.640249] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: TAD CH#0, offset #0: 33.792 GB (0x0000000840000000), reg=0x00008400
> [52803.640252] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: TAD CH#1, offset #0: 33.792 GB (0x0000000840000000), reg=0x00008400
> [52803.640255] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: TAD CH#2, offset #0: 33.792 GB (0x0000000840000000), reg=0x00008400
> [52803.640258] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: TAD CH#3, offset #0: 33.792 GB (0x0000000840000000), reg=0x00008400
> [52803.640261] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: CH#0 RIR#0, limit: 8.191 GB (0x00000001fff00000), way: 4, reg=0xa000001e
> [52803.640264] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: CH#0 RIR#0 INTL#0, offset 0.000 GB (0x0000000000000000), tgt: 0, reg=0x00000000
> [52803.640278] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: CH#0 RIR#0 INTL#1, offset 0.000 GB (0x0000000000000000), tgt: 4, reg=0x00040000
> [52803.640281] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: CH#0 RIR#0 INTL#2, offset 0.000 GB (0x0000000000000000), tgt: 1, reg=0x00010000
> [52803.640283] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: CH#0 RIR#0 INTL#3, offset 0.000 GB (0x0000000000000000), tgt: 5, reg=0x00050000
> [52803.640287] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: CH#1 RIR#0, limit: 8.191 GB (0x00000001fff00000), way: 4, reg=0xa000001e
> [52803.640290] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: CH#1 RIR#0 INTL#0, offset 0.000 GB (0x0000000000000000), tgt: 0, reg=0x00000000
> [52803.640293] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: CH#1 RIR#0 INTL#1, offset 0.000 GB (0x0000000000000000), tgt: 4, reg=0x00040000
> [52803.640296] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: CH#1 RIR#0 INTL#2, offset 0.000 GB (0x0000000000000000), tgt: 1, reg=0x00010000
> [52803.640299] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: CH#1 RIR#0 INTL#3, offset 0.000 GB (0x0000000000000000), tgt: 5, reg=0x00050000
> [52803.640303] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: CH#2 RIR#0, limit: 8.191 GB (0x00000001fff00000), way: 4, reg=0xa000001e
> [52803.640306] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: CH#2 RIR#0 INTL#0, offset 0.000 GB (0x0000000000000000), tgt: 0, reg=0x00000000
> [52803.640309] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: CH#2 RIR#0 INTL#1, offset 0.000 GB (0x0000000000000000), tgt: 4, reg=0x00040000
> [52803.640312] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: CH#2 RIR#0 INTL#2, offset 0.000 GB (0x0000000000000000), tgt: 1, reg=0x00010000
> [52803.640315] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: CH#2 RIR#0 INTL#3, offset 0.000 GB (0x0000000000000000), tgt: 5, reg=0x00050000
> [52803.640319] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: CH#3 RIR#0, limit: 8.191 GB (0x00000001fff00000), way: 4, reg=0xa000001e
> [52803.640322] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: CH#3 RIR#0 INTL#0, offset 0.000 GB (0x0000000000000000), tgt: 0, reg=0x00000000
> [52803.640324] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: CH#3 RIR#0 INTL#1, offset 0.000 GB (0x0000000000000000), tgt: 4, reg=0x00040000
> [52803.640327] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: CH#3 RIR#0 INTL#2, offset 0.000 GB (0x0000000000000000), tgt: 1, reg=0x00010000
> [52803.640330] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: CH#3 RIR#0 INTL#3, offset 0.000 GB (0x0000000000000000), tgt: 5, reg=0x00050000
>
> In this case, all 4 channels are used for interleave:
Ok, this has 4 channels.
> [52803.640245] EDAC DEBUG: get_memory_layout: TAD#0: up to 66.560 GB (0x0000001040000000), socket interleave 0, memory interleave 3, TGT: 0, 1, 2, 3, reg=0x0040f3e4
>
> It doesn't do DIMM socket interleave (socket interleave 0). It does channel interleave
> among channels 0 to 3 (TGT: 0, 1, 2, 3).
>
> It also does an interleave at the physical memory address on bits 6 to 8:
Ok.
[..]
> For Nehalem, see i7core_edac comments that I added at the beginning of the
> driver:
>
> * Based on the following public Intel datasheets:
> * Intel Core i7 Processor Extreme Edition and Intel Core i7 Processor
> * Datasheet, Volume 2:
> * http://download.intel.com/design/processor/datashts/320835.pdf
> * Intel Xeon Processor 5500 Series Datasheet Volume 2
> * http://www.intel.com/Assets/PDF/datasheet/321322.pdf
This is 404.
> * also available at:
> * http://www.arrownac.com/manufacturers/intel/s/nehalem/5500-datasheet-v2.pdf
This one works.
> >> No. As far as I can tell, they can have 9 quad-ranked DIMMs (the machines
> >> I've looked so far are all equipped with single rank memories, so I don't
> >> have a real scenario with 2R or 4R for Nehalem yet).
Well, the xeon 5500 datasheet, vol2 has a table 3-2 of RDIMM population
configs and according to it, it can do only one 4R DIMM in the farthest
slot, page 127 from here:
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/xeon/xeon-processor-5000-sequence/Xeon5000TechnicalResources.html
?
> >> At Sandy Bridge-EP (E. g. Intel E5 CPUs), we have one machine fully equipped
> >> with dual rank memories. The number of ranks there is just a DIMM property.
> >>
> >> # ./edac-ctl --layout
> >> +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> >> | mc0 | mc1 |
> >> | channel0 | channel1 | channel2 | channel3 | channel0 | channel1 | channel2 | channel3 |
> >> -------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> >> slot2: | 0 MB | 0 MB | 0 MB | 0 MB | 0 MB | 0 MB | 0 MB | 0 MB |
> >> slot1: | 4096 MB | 4096 MB | 4096 MB | 4096 MB | 4096 MB | 4096 MB | 4096 MB | 4096 MB |
> >> slot0: | 4096 MB | 4096 MB | 4096 MB | 4096 MB | 4096 MB | 4096 MB | 4096 MB | 4096 MB |
> >> -------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> >>
> >> (this machine doesn't have physical DIMM sockets for slot#2)
This looks like a 4-channel memory controller with 3 physical slots per
channel.
> > Ok, I can count 8 2R DIMMs here and each rank or slot in your
> > nomenclature is 4G. slot#2 has to be something virtual since each rank
> > occupies one slot, i.e. slot0 and slot1 on a channel.
>
> No. This machine has 64 GB of RAM, and it was physically filled with 16 DIMMs,
> each with 4GB. Each of the above represents one DIMM (and not a rank).
Yep, I see that now.
>
> Btw, the above logs are for this machine.
>
> # free
> total used free shared buffers cached
> Mem: 65933268 1166384 64766884 0 60572 363712
> -/+ buffers/cache: 742100 65191168
> Swap: 68157436 18680 68138756
>
> The DMI decode info also clearly states that:
>
> # dmidecode|grep -e "Memory Device$" -e Size -e "Bank Locat" -e "Serial Number" |grep -v Range
> ...
> Memory Device
> Size: 4096 MB
> Bank Locator: NODE 0 CHANNEL 0 DIMM 0
> Serial Number: 82766209
> Memory Device
> Size: 4096 MB
> Bank Locator: NODE 0 CHANNEL 0 DIMM 1
> Serial Number: 827661D3
> Memory Device
> Size: 4096 MB
> Bank Locator: NODE 0 CHANNEL 1 DIMM 0
> Serial Number: 82766197
[..]
> As I said, for this memory controller, and for Nehalem, the memories are
> mapped per DIMM socket (and not per rank).
Ok, so there are still ranks and this is how the memory controller
addresses them but they can be interleaved (or not) depending on the
configuration. The registers describing the DIMMs are per-DIMM and have
fields like NUMRANK etc which tells you how many ranks a DIMM has, etc.
Then there are the MC_SAG_CH{0,1,2}_{1-7} which describes 8 interleave
ranges and those are actually the chip select rows == ranks.
And now the question is, when you get a DRAM ECC, how does the hardware
point to the DIMM in error, does it give you a (channel, slot) tuple
or a virtual address which you have to un-interleave? From MCA, you're
getting a virtual address in MC4_ADDR so how do you compute this one
back to a DIMM?
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-25 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 161+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-29 16:45 [PATCH 00/13] Convert EDAC internal strutures to support all types of Memory Controllers Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-29 16:45 ` [PATCH 01/13] edac: Create a dimm struct and move the labels into it Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-30 10:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-03-30 13:26 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-30 15:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-16 8:41 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 11:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-16 11:44 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 13:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-03-29 16:45 ` [PATCH 02/13] edac: move dimm properties to struct memset_info Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-30 13:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-03-30 13:22 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-30 17:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-16 8:56 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 13:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-03-29 16:45 ` [PATCH 03/13] edac: Don't initialize csrow's first_page & friends when not needed Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-02 12:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-03-29 16:45 ` [PATCH 04/13] edac: move nr_pages to dimm struct Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-02 13:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-03-29 16:45 ` [PATCH 05/13] edac: Fix core support for MC's that see DIMMS instead of ranks Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-29 16:45 ` [PATCH 06/13] edac: Initialize the dimm label with the known information Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-29 16:45 ` [PATCH 07/13] edac: Cleanup the logs for i7core and sb edac drivers Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-29 16:45 ` [PATCH 08/13] i5400_edac: improve debug messages to better represent the filled memory Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-29 16:45 ` [PATCH 09/13] events/hw_event: Create a Hardware Events Report Mecanism (HERM) Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-29 16:45 ` [PATCH 10/13] i5000_edac: Fix the logic that retrieves memory information Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-29 16:45 ` [PATCH 11/13] e752x_edac: provide more info about how DIMMS/ranks are mapped Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-29 16:45 ` [PATCH 12/13] edac: Rename the parent dev to pdev Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-29 16:45 ` [PATCH 13/13] edac: use Documentation-nano format for some data structs Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-29 20:46 ` [PATCH 00/13] Convert EDAC internal strutures to support all types of Memory Controllers Aristeu Rozanski Filho
2012-04-02 13:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-16 12:58 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 14:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-16 20:12 ` [EDAC PATCH v13 0/7] Convert EDAC core to work with non-csrow-based memory controllers Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:12 ` [EDAC PATCH v13 1/7] edac: Create a dimm struct and move the labels into it Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-26 14:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-16 20:12 ` [EDAC PATCH v13 3/7] edac: Don't initialize csrow's first_page & friends when not needed Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:12 ` [EDAC PATCH v13 4/7] edac: move nr_pages to dimm struct Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-17 18:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-17 19:28 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-17 21:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-18 12:58 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-18 17:53 ` [PATCH] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:12 ` [EDAC PATCH v13 5/7] edac: rewrite edac_align_ptr() Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-18 14:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-18 15:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-18 18:15 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-18 18:19 ` [PATCH] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-23 14:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-23 15:19 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-23 15:26 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:12 ` [EDAC PATCH v13 6/7] edac.h: Prepare to handle with generic layers Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-23 17:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-23 18:30 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-23 18:56 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-23 19:19 ` [PATCH] edac.h: Add generic layers for describing a memory location Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-23 20:07 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-24 10:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-24 10:40 ` [EDAC PATCH v13 6/7] edac.h: Prepare to handle with generic layers Borislav Petkov
2012-04-24 11:46 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-24 12:42 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-24 12:49 ` [PATCH] edac.h: Add generic layers for describing a memory location Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-24 13:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-24 13:22 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-24 13:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-24 16:39 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-24 16:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-24 17:38 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
[not found] ` <1335291342-14922-1-git-send-email-mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-24 18:15 ` [PATCH EDACv16 2/2] amd64_edac: convert driver to use the new edac ABI Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-27 10:42 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-27 13:33 ` [PATCH EDACv16 1/2] edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Borislav Petkov
2012-04-27 14:11 ` Joe Perches
2012-04-27 15:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-27 16:07 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-28 8:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-28 20:38 ` Joe Perches
2012-04-29 14:25 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-29 15:11 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-29 16:03 ` Joe Perches
2012-04-29 17:18 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-29 16:20 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-29 16:43 ` Joe Perches
2012-04-29 17:39 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-30 7:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-30 11:09 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-30 11:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-30 11:46 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-27 15:36 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-28 9:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-29 13:49 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-30 8:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-30 10:58 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-30 11:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-30 11:45 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-30 12:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-30 13:00 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-30 13:53 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-30 15:02 ` [PATCH v2] edac_mc: Cleanup per-dimm_info debug messages Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-30 15:10 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-30 15:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-30 15:33 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-30 16:16 ` Joe Perches
2012-04-30 16:47 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-30 16:44 ` [PATCHv3] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-30 11:37 ` [PATCH EDACv16 1/2] edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-27 17:52 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-28 9:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-28 17:07 ` Joe Perches
2012-04-29 14:02 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-29 14:16 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-30 7:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-30 11:23 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-30 12:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-24 12:55 ` [EDAC PATCH v13 6/7] edac.h: Prepare to handle with generic layers Borislav Petkov
2012-04-24 13:11 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-24 13:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-24 14:24 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-24 16:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-24 17:24 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-25 17:19 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2012-04-25 17:47 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-25 18:32 ` Luck, Tony
2012-04-25 18:44 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-26 14:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-26 14:25 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-26 14:59 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-25 17:55 ` Luck, Tony
2012-04-24 17:31 ` Luck, Tony
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 00/26] Use the new EDAC kernel ABI on drivers Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 01/26] amd64_edac: convert driver to use the new edac ABI Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-07 14:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-07 16:12 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-07 16:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-07 16:59 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-07 19:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-07 16:24 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 02/26] amd76x_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 03/26] cell_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 04/26] cpc925_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 05/26] e752x_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 06/26] e7xxx_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 07/26] i3000_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 08/26] i3200_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 09/26] i5000_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 10/26] i5100_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 11/26] i5400_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 12/26] i7300_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 13/26] i7core_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 14/26] i82443bxgx_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 15/26] i82860_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 16/26] i82875p_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 17/26] i82975x_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 18/26] mpc85xx_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 19/26] mv64x60_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 20/26] pasemi_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 21/26] ppc4xx_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 22/26] r82600_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 23/26] sb_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 24/26] tile_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-26 19:47 ` Chris Metcalf
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 25/26] x38_edac: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-04-16 20:21 ` [EDAC_ABI PATCH v13 26/26] edac: Remove the legacy EDAC ABI Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120425171904.GM18882@aftab.osrc.amd.com \
--to=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=norsk5@yahoo.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®