mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org" 
	<uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] asm-generic: io: remove {read,write} string functions
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:14:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120427171433.GE14743@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F9AC806.60608@zytor.com>

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 05:23:34PM +0100, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 04/27/2012 03:42 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > The {read,write}s{b,w,l} functions are not defined across all
> > architectures and therefore shouldn't be used by portable drivers. We
> > should encourage driver writers to use the io{read,write}{8,16,32}_rep
> > functions instead.
> 
> Why is that?  ioread/write are great if the address space is undefined,
> but do we need the extra overhead in any other cases?

I think it's because in reality not many drivers are using
the {read,write}s{b,w,l} accessors:

drivers/bluetooth/btmrvl_sdio.c
drivers/bluetooth/btsdio.c
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
drivers/mmc/core/sdio_io.c
drivers/mmc/host/msm_sdcc.c
drivers/mmc/host/mvsdio.c
drivers/mmc/host/omap.c
drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc.h
drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
drivers/mtd/nand/gpio.c
drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c
drivers/net/ethernet/8390/ax88796.c
drivers/net/ethernet/8390/etherh.c
drivers/net/ethernet/davicom/dm9000.c
drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/ether3.c
drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc911x.h
drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.h
drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/sdio.c
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh_sdmmc.c
drivers/net/wireless/libertas/if_sdio.c
drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sdio.c
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/sdio.c
drivers/parport/parport_ip32.c
drivers/pci/hotplug/ibmphp_core.c
drivers/pci/hotplug/ibmphp_ebda.c
drivers/pci/hotplug/ibmphp.h
drivers/pci/hotplug/ibmphp_hpc.c
drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.c
drivers/scsi/arm/cumana_2.c
drivers/scsi/arm/oak.c
drivers/ssb/sdio.c
drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c
drivers/usb/gadget/s3c2410_udc.c
drivers/usb/gadget/s3c-hsotg.c
drivers/usb/host/isp1362.h
drivers/usb/musb/am35x.c
drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c
drivers/usb/musb/musb_io.h
drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010.c

If you remove the architecture-specific drivers, there's really not a lot left
and, even then, we only need to convert those drivers which are intended to
be portable between architectures where the string functions are not
consistently available.

By overheads, I assume you're referring to the IO_COND check on the address
space? I wouldn't expect this to be noticeable compared to the cost of the
I/O access and I'm not sure it's worth worrying about for the sake of the
small number of drivers affected.

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-27 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-27 10:42 Will Deacon
2012-04-27 10:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] asm-generic: io: don't perform swab during {in,out} " Will Deacon
2012-04-27 12:12   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-27 16:18   ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-27 16:59     ` Will Deacon
2012-04-27 17:26       ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-27 12:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] asm-generic: io: remove {read,write} " Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-27 16:17 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-27 16:53   ` Will Deacon
2012-04-27 17:18     ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-28  8:46     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-04-27 20:29   ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-27 16:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-27 17:14   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2012-04-27 17:53     ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-27 20:52       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-27 23:26         ` Mike Frysinger
2012-05-01 13:34           ` Will Deacon
2012-05-01 14:40             ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-01 18:28             ` Mike Frysinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120427171433.GE14743@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org \
    --cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome