Re: [GIT PULL 0/5] perf/annotate fixes and improvements

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>]

Em Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:11:07PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Hi,
> 
> 2012-05-03 (목), 15:12 +0200, Peter Zijlstra:
> > On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 10:05 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > Also, in this case the asm is dark blue, which is nearly invisible on my
> > > > black background.
> > > 
> > > What colour do you suggest? Also what kind of term color scheme do you
> > > use? Finding the right default combo is kinda hard. 
> > 
> > Yeah, I know.. I use white text on black background.
> > 
> > Typically for vim I use :se bg=dark
> > 
> > Anyway, I find it weird that the asm is coloured completely different
> > between the two modes. If anything I would keep the asm as in the
> > non-source variant and when you add the source, make that a different
> > colour.
> > 
> 
> It was changed on commit 58e817d997d1 ("perf annotate: Print asm code as
> blue when source code is displayed") by me. I just tried to make the
> output as same as the --stdio one, but I felt bad on printing the whole
> asm lines as blue when no source is shown - I use similar color scheme
> of yours - so I just ended up leaving it to the default white.

I'll revert that one, I agree with Peter that we should have the same
color for asm with/without source code.

If you feel like source code should be in another color, then try to
find one that works well with some common term color schemes and propose
a patch.

- Arnaldo