From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752569Ab2EJB4r (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 9 May 2012 21:56:47 -0400
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:45204 "EHLO
	shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750950Ab2EJB4p (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 9 May 2012 21:56:45 -0400
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 21:53:30 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20120509.215330.1797609915710094377.davem@davemloft.net>
To: joe@perches.com
Cc: julia.lawall@lip6.fr, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
        netfilter@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] net: Add and use ether_addr_equal
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <1336614484.1905.19.camel@joe2Laptop>
References: <cover.1336538937.git.joe@perches.com>
	<20120509.212110.437114897180819434.davem@davemloft.net>
	<1336614484.1905.19.camel@joe2Laptop>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 23.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (shards.monkeyblade.net [198.137.202.13]); Wed, 09 May 2012 18:53:33 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 18:48:04 -0700

> Maybe just a single patch?

Yes, I think high density on this one, it's extremely
mechanical.

> Also the compare_ether_addr_64bits function is
> still used a couple dozen times.  Maybe another
> patch for those?  ether_addr_equal_64bits?

Use your best judgment.