From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932456Ab2EIVib (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2012 17:38:31 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([193.178.161.156]:34530 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932246Ab2EIVi2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2012 17:38:28 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Linux PM list Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] PM / Domains / cpuidle: Preliminary cpuidle support for generic PM domains Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 23:40:26 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/3.4.0-rc6+; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: LKML , Len Brown , Colin Cross , Kevin Hilman , Magnus Damm , Arjan van de Ven , Santosh Shilimkar MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201205092340.26561.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, Since people have been spending quite some time on cpuidle recently, I thought it might be a good time to show some ideas about how to make cpuidle work along with the generic PM domains framework (and the other way around). The first patch is just an addition that's used by the second one. The second patch is not functional code and untested, so it is for comments only right now (no signoff), although I did my best to make is as close to functional as possible. The details are in the changelogs, please tell me what you think. Thanks, Rafael