From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965971Ab2EOSBP (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2012 14:01:15 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:51997 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932207Ab2EOSBK (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2012 14:01:10 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 20:01:06 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Oliver Neukum Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , kernel list , linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, marcel@holtmann.org, gustavo@padovan.org, johan.hedberg@gmail.com Subject: Re: 3.4.0-rc7 regression: bluetooth vs. s2ram Message-ID: <20120515180105.GA1923@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20120515131453.GA1936@elf.ucw.cz> <201205151529.01603.oneukum@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201205151529.01603.oneukum@suse.de> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue 2012-05-15 15:29:01, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Dienstag, 15. Mai 2012, 15:14:57 schrieb Pavel Machek: > > If I suspend without bnep0 active, resume works. > > > > (This has worked before, but "before" may mean 3.2 in this case). > > > > Can someone test/reproduce this? Ideas? > > > > PS: Under normal suspend/resume, I see these warnings in the > > log. Maybe relevant? > > Most likely. Something has introduced a bug that crashes if the controller > over which a bnep is run is getting away. Does it survive a surprise removal > of the BT device while bnep is up? No, it does not. If I turn off hardware radio kill switch, machine dies in the same way. So not just sleep related... Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html