From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
To: "Turquette, Mike" <mturquette@ti.com>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Clock register in early init
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 12:19:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120523091954.GA8730@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJOA=zNic19Eyq-RJpj_pM94wpqY7co0dtKu1O+27B-wZMm=MA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 07:37:15PM +0200, Turquette, Mike wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Peter De Schrijver
> <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >> We had at-least that on the older Samsung parts and they where still
> >> growing. I would suggest that in a multi-kernel image situation the
> >> more data that can be discarded after init-time the better.
> >>
> >> Also, __initdata gets gathered into one place so there's no possibility
> >> of page fragmentation there. If you mean fragmentation of the memory
> >> map, then allocate the size of all the clocks you know of at init time
> >> in one go.
> >>
> >
> > That would work, except that clocks are needed before kmalloc is available.
> >
>
> Is static initialization the only way to solve this problem? What
> about using the bootmem allocator for early init clocks?
>
If it can be handled inside the framework somehow. I would want to avoid
having several places where clocks inside the same SoC are initialized.
Cheers,
Peter.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-23 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1337227884.2066.9.camel@pgaikwad-dt2>
[not found] ` <20120517062131.GA9305@gmail.com>
2012-05-18 4:48 ` Prashant Gaikwad
2012-05-18 11:21 ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-05-18 20:17 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-05-21 8:46 ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-05-21 18:05 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-05-22 11:15 ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-05-22 9:20 ` Ben Dooks
2012-05-22 12:08 ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-05-22 17:37 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-05-23 9:19 ` Peter De Schrijver [this message]
2012-05-23 16:20 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-05-24 1:02 ` Paul Mundt
2012-05-24 15:51 ` Turquette, Mike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120523091954.GA8730@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com \
--to=pdeschrijver@nvidia.com \
--cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@ti.com \
--cc=pgaikwad@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome