mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFSd: fix locking in nfsd_forget_delegations()
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 17:31:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120523213158.GB13710@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120522102444.6988.45434.stgit@localhost.localdomain>

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 02:25:14PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> This patch adds recall_lock hold to nfsd_forget_delegations() to protect
> nfsd_process_n_delegations() call.
> Also, looks like it would be better to collect delegations to some local
> on-stack list, and then unhash collected list. This split allows to simplify
> locking, because delegation traversing is protected by recall_lock, when
> delegation unhash is protected by client_mutex.

All this indirection is getting a little much.

How about replacing nfsd_process_n_delegations by something that always
does the list-move?:

void nfsd_forget_delegations(u64 num)
{
	unsigned int count;
	list_head victims;

	nfs4_lock_state();
	count = nfsd_get_n_delegations(num, &victims);
	list_for_each_entry_safe(..., &victims, ...)
		unhash_delegation();
	unlock_state();
}

ditto for recall_delegations, and take the recall_lock inside
nfsd_get_n_delegations?

Or something like that.

--b.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
> ---
>  fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c |   32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index 21266c7..f004e61 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -2597,7 +2597,7 @@ out:
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static void nfsd_break_one_deleg(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
> +static void nfsd_break_one_deleg(struct nfs4_delegation *dp, void *data)
>  {
>  	/* We're assuming the state code never drops its reference
>  	 * without first removing the lease.  Since we're in this lease
> @@ -2633,7 +2633,7 @@ static void nfsd_break_deleg_cb(struct file_lock *fl)
>  	spin_lock(&recall_lock);
>  	fp->fi_had_conflict = true;
>  	list_for_each_entry(dp, &fp->fi_delegations, dl_perfile)
> -		nfsd_break_one_deleg(dp);
> +		nfsd_break_one_deleg(dp, NULL);
>  	spin_unlock(&recall_lock);
>  }
>  
> @@ -4694,7 +4694,7 @@ void nfsd_forget_openowners(u64 num)
>  	printk(KERN_INFO "NFSD: Forgot %d open owners", count);
>  }
>  
> -int nfsd_process_n_delegations(u64 num, void (*deleg_func)(struct nfs4_delegation *))
> +int nfsd_process_n_delegations(u64 num, void (*deleg_func)(struct nfs4_delegation *, void *), void *data)
>  {
>  	int i, count = 0;
>  	struct nfs4_file *fp, *fnext;
> @@ -4703,7 +4703,7 @@ int nfsd_process_n_delegations(u64 num, void (*deleg_func)(struct nfs4_delegatio
>  	for (i = 0; i < FILE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
>  		list_for_each_entry_safe(fp, fnext, &file_hashtbl[i], fi_hash) {
>  			list_for_each_entry_safe(dp, dnext, &fp->fi_delegations, dl_perfile) {
> -				deleg_func(dp);
> +				deleg_func(dp, data);
>  				if (++count == num)
>  					return count;
>  			}
> @@ -4713,15 +4713,31 @@ int nfsd_process_n_delegations(u64 num, void (*deleg_func)(struct nfs4_delegatio
>  	return count;
>  }
>  
> +/* Called under the recall_lock spinlock. */
> +static void
> +collect_delegation(struct nfs4_delegation *dp, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct list_head *list = data;
> +
> +	list_move(&dp->dl_perfile, list);
> +}
> +
>  void nfsd_forget_delegations(u64 num)
>  {
>  	unsigned int count;
> +	struct nfs4_delegation *dp, *dnext;
> +	LIST_HEAD(unhash_list);
>  
> -	nfs4_lock_state();
> -	count = nfsd_process_n_delegations(num, unhash_delegation);
> -	nfs4_unlock_state();
> +	spin_lock(&recall_lock);
> +	count = nfsd_process_n_delegations(num, collect_delegation, &unhash_list);
> +	spin_unlock(&recall_lock);
>  
>  	printk(KERN_INFO "NFSD: Forgot %d delegations", count);
> +
> +	nfs4_lock_state();
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(dp, dnext, &unhash_list, dl_perfile)
> +		unhash_delegation(dp);
> +	nfs4_unlock_state();
>  }
>  
>  void nfsd_recall_delegations(u64 num)
> @@ -4730,7 +4746,7 @@ void nfsd_recall_delegations(u64 num)
>  
>  	nfs4_lock_state();
>  	spin_lock(&recall_lock);
> -	count = nfsd_process_n_delegations(num, nfsd_break_one_deleg);
> +	count = nfsd_process_n_delegations(num, nfsd_break_one_deleg, NULL);
>  	spin_unlock(&recall_lock);
>  	nfs4_unlock_state();
>  
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-23 21:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-22 10:25 Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-05-23 21:31 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2012-05-24  4:41   ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-05-24 10:56     ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-24 11:09       ` Stanislav Kinsbursky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120523213158.GB13710@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome