On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 07:40:49PM +0800, Lee Jones wrote:
> On May 30, 2012 6:03 PM, "Mark Brown" <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

> > If we are changing the names then not including the ab8500 bit would
> > seem more idiomatic - we've already worked out which chip this is by the
> > time we're looking here.

> No, Linus had the wrong end of the stick. I've just spoken to him in person.

> Those are not the names of the regulators. They're the names of the Device
> Tree nodes. The regulator names shall remain the same.

Fair enough.  My point about the ab8500_ bit still stands though.