From: Jamie Heilman <jamie@audible.transient.net>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RPC: fragment too large with transition to 3.4
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 09:27:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120613092703.GA4701@cucamonga.audible.transient.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120613060627.GA11421@cucamonga.audible.transient.net>
Jamie Heilman wrote:
> It's looking like my issues with "RPC: fragment too large" may be
> something else entirely at this point, I've noticed other weird
> network behavior that I'm gonna have to try to isolate before I keep
> blaming nfs changes. Though for some reason my
> /proc/fs/nfsd/max_block_size ends up only 128KiB w/3.4 where it was
> 512KiB w/3.3.
OK, I get it now. 32-bit PAE system w/4G of RAM (minus a chunk for
the IGP video etc.) for my NFS server, and the max_block_size
calculation changed significantly in commit
508f92275624fc755104b17945bdc822936f1918 to account for rpc buffers
only being in low memory. That means whereas in 3.3 the math came out
to having a target size of roughly 843241 my new target size in 3.4 is
only 219959-ish, so choosing 128KiB is understandable. The problem
was that all my clients had negotiated their nfs mounts against the
v3.3 value of 512KiB, and when I rebooted into 3.4... they hit the
wall attempting larger transfers and become uselessly stuck at that
point. If I remount everything before doing any large transfers, then
it negotiates a lower wsize and things work fine. So everything is
working as planned I suppose... the transition between 3.3 and 3.4 is
just a bit rough.
--
Jamie Heilman http://audible.transient.net/~jamie/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-13 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-10 9:03 NFSv4 regression, kernel BUG at fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:1044! Jamie Heilman
2012-06-11 3:41 ` Jamie Heilman
2012-06-11 16:14 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-06-12 10:13 ` Jamie Heilman
2012-06-12 11:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-06-12 12:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-06-13 6:06 ` Jamie Heilman
2012-06-13 9:27 ` Jamie Heilman [this message]
2012-06-13 15:56 ` RPC: fragment too large with transition to 3.4 J. Bruce Fields
2012-06-19 6:15 ` NFSv4 regression, kernel BUG at fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:1044! Benny Halevy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120613092703.GA4701@cucamonga.audible.transient.net \
--to=jamie@audible.transient.net \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®