mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	yinghai@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	gorcunov@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, x2apic: limit the vector reservation to the user specified mask
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:04:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120621090451.GD2223@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340149411-2972-2-git-send-email-suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 04:43:31PM -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> For the x2apic cluster mode, vector for an interrupt is currently reserved on
> all the cpu's that are part of the x2apic cluster. But the interrupts will
> be routed only to the cluster (derived from the first cpu in the mask) members
> specified in the mask. So there is no need to reserve the vector in the unused
> cluster members.
> 
> Modify __assign_irq_vector() to reserve the vectors based on the user
> specified irq destination mask and the corresponding vector domain specified
> by the apic driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h           |   14 +++++++++---
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_noop.c      |    5 +++-
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c        |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_cluster.c |    8 ++++--
>  4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> index b37fa12..7746acb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> @@ -306,7 +306,9 @@ struct apic {
>  	unsigned long (*check_apicid_used)(physid_mask_t *map, int apicid);
>  	unsigned long (*check_apicid_present)(int apicid);
>  
> -	void (*vector_allocation_domain)(int cpu, struct cpumask *retmask);
> +	void (*vector_allocation_domain)(const struct cpumask *mask,
> +					 struct cpumask *retmask,
> +					 const struct cpumask *prevmask);
>  	void (*init_apic_ldr)(void);
>  
>  	void (*ioapic_phys_id_map)(physid_mask_t *phys_map, physid_mask_t *retmap);
> @@ -615,7 +617,9 @@ default_cpu_mask_to_apicid_and(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
>  			       unsigned int *apicid);
>  
>  static inline void
> -flat_vector_allocation_domain(int cpu, struct cpumask *retmask)
> +flat_vector_allocation_domain(const struct cpumask *mask,
> +			      struct cpumask *retmask,
> +			      const struct cpumask *prevmask)
>  {
>  	/* Careful. Some cpus do not strictly honor the set of cpus
>  	 * specified in the interrupt destination when using lowest
> @@ -630,9 +634,11 @@ flat_vector_allocation_domain(int cpu, struct cpumask *retmask)
>  }
>  
>  static inline void
> -default_vector_allocation_domain(int cpu, struct cpumask *retmask)
> +default_vector_allocation_domain(const struct cpumask *mask,
> +				 struct cpumask *retmask,
> +				 const struct cpumask *prevmask)
>  {
> -	cpumask_copy(retmask, cpumask_of(cpu));
> +	cpumask_copy(retmask, cpumask_of(cpumask_first(retmask)));
>  }
>  
>  static inline unsigned long default_check_apicid_used(physid_mask_t *map, int apicid)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_noop.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_noop.c
> index 08c337b..847ece1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_noop.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_noop.c
> @@ -100,8 +100,11 @@ static unsigned long noop_check_apicid_present(int bit)
>  	return physid_isset(bit, phys_cpu_present_map);
>  }
>  
> -static void noop_vector_allocation_domain(int cpu, struct cpumask *retmask)
> +static void noop_vector_allocation_domain(const struct cpumask *mask,
> +					  struct cpumask *retmask,
> +					  const struct cpumask *prevmask)
>  {
> +	int cpu = cpumask_first(retmask);
>  	if (cpu != 0)
>  		pr_warning("APIC: Vector allocated for non-BSP cpu\n");
>  	cpumask_copy(retmask, cpumask_of(cpu));
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> index 7a945f8..0a55eb8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> @@ -1097,6 +1097,22 @@ void unlock_vector_lock(void)
>  	raw_spin_unlock(&vector_lock);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * New cpu mask using the vector is a subset of the current in use mask.
> + * So cleanup the vector allocation for the members that are not used anymore.
> + */
> +static inline int
> +cleanup_unused_subset(struct cpumask *mask, struct irq_cfg *cfg)
> +{
> +	if (!cpumask_equal(mask, cfg->domain)) {
> +		cpumask_andnot(cfg->old_domain, cfg->domain, mask);
> +		cfg->move_in_progress = 1;
> +		cpumask_and(cfg->domain, cfg->domain, mask);
> +	}
> +	free_cpumask_var(mask);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +

Adding to 1st Yinghai's comment, this function does not appear needed at all...

>  static int
>  __assign_irq_vector(int irq, struct irq_cfg *cfg, const struct cpumask *mask)
>  {
> @@ -1126,10 +1142,9 @@ __assign_irq_vector(int irq, struct irq_cfg *cfg, const struct cpumask *mask)
>  	old_vector = cfg->vector;
>  	if (old_vector) {
>  		cpumask_and(tmp_mask, mask, cpu_online_mask);
> -		if (cpumask_subset(tmp_mask, cfg->domain)) {
> -			free_cpumask_var(tmp_mask);
> -			return 0;
> -		}
> +		apic->vector_allocation_domain(mask, tmp_mask, cfg->domain);
> +		if (cpumask_subset(tmp_mask, cfg->domain))
> +			return cleanup_unused_subset(tmp_mask, cfg);

...but if you decide to leave cleanup_unused_subset() then cpumask_subset()
check is better to move inside the function while free_cpumask_var() move
out.

>  	}
>  
>  	/* Only try and allocate irqs on cpus that are present */
> @@ -1137,15 +1152,12 @@ __assign_irq_vector(int irq, struct irq_cfg *cfg, const struct cpumask *mask)
>  	cpumask_clear(cfg->old_domain);
>  	cpu = cpumask_first_and(mask, cpu_online_mask);
>  	while (cpu < nr_cpu_ids) {
> -		int new_cpu;
> -		int vector, offset;
> +		int new_cpu, vector, offset;
>  
> -		apic->vector_allocation_domain(cpu, tmp_mask);
> -
> -		if (cpumask_subset(tmp_mask, cfg->domain)) {
> -			free_cpumask_var(tmp_mask);
> -			return 0;
> -		}
> +		cpumask_copy(tmp_mask, cpumask_of(cpu));
> +		apic->vector_allocation_domain(mask, tmp_mask, cfg->domain);

I might be missing the point.. in the two lines above you copy a cpumask to
tmp_mask, then scan it in vector_allocation_domain() just to find the cpu
which you already know. Why not just pass cpu rather then cpumask_of(cpu)?

> +		if (cpumask_subset(tmp_mask, cfg->domain))
> +			return cleanup_unused_subset(tmp_mask, cfg);
>  
>  		vector = current_vector;
>  		offset = current_offset;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_cluster.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_cluster.c
> index b5d889b..4d49512 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_cluster.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_cluster.c
> @@ -212,10 +212,12 @@ static int x2apic_cluster_probe(void)
>  /*
>   * Each x2apic cluster is an allocation domain.
>   */
> -static void cluster_vector_allocation_domain(int cpu, struct cpumask *retmask)
> +static void cluster_vector_allocation_domain(const struct cpumask *mask,
> +					     struct cpumask *retmask,
> +					     const struct cpumask *prevmask)
>  {
> -	cpumask_clear(retmask);
> -	cpumask_copy(retmask, per_cpu(cpus_in_cluster, cpu));
> +	int cpu = cpumask_first(retmask);
> +	cpumask_and(retmask, mask, per_cpu(cpus_in_cluster, cpu));
>  }
>  
>  static struct apic apic_x2apic_cluster = {
> -- 
> 1.7.6.5
> 

-- 
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@redhat.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-21  9:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-18 10:26 [PATCH 2/3] x86: x2apic/cluster: Make use of lowest priority delivery mode Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-18 14:41 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-18 15:42   ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-18 15:51     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-19 10:47       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-21  7:11         ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21  9:46           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-19 20:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-21  8:13   ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21 23:02     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-21 23:33       ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-22  9:36         ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21 23:44     ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-21 23:58       ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, irq: update irq_cfg domain unless the new affinity is a subset of the current domain Suresh Siddha
2012-05-21 23:58         ` [PATCH 2/2] x2apic, cluster: use all the members of one cluster specified in the smp_affinity mask for the interrupt desintation Suresh Siddha
2012-05-22  7:04           ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-22  7:34             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-22 17:21             ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-22 17:39               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-22 17:42                 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-22 17:45                   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-22 20:03           ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-06 15:04           ` [tip:x86/apic] x86/x2apic/cluster: Use all the members of one cluster specified in the smp_affinity mask for the interrupt destination tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2012-06-06 22:21             ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-06 23:14               ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-06 15:03         ` [tip:x86/apic] x86/irq: Update irq_cfg domain unless the new affinity is a subset of the current domain tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2012-08-07 15:31           ` Robert Richter
2012-08-07 15:41             ` do_IRQ: 1.55 No irq handler for vector (irq -1) Borislav Petkov
2012-08-07 16:24               ` Suresh Siddha
2012-08-07 17:28                 ` Robert Richter
2012-08-07 17:47                   ` Suresh Siddha
2012-08-07 17:45                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-08-07 20:57                   ` Borislav Petkov
2012-08-07 22:39                     ` Suresh Siddha
2012-08-08  8:58                       ` Robert Richter
2012-08-08 11:04                         ` Borislav Petkov
2012-08-08 19:16                           ` Suresh Siddha
2012-08-14 17:02                             ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, apic: fix broken legacy interrupts in the logical apic mode tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2012-06-06 17:20         ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, irq: update irq_cfg domain unless the new affinity is a subset of the current domain Alexander Gordeev
2012-06-06 23:02           ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-16  0:25           ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-18  9:17             ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-06-19  0:51               ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-19 23:43                 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, apic: optimize cpu traversal in __assign_irq_vector() using domain membership Suresh Siddha
2012-06-19 23:43                   ` [PATCH 2/2] x86, x2apic: limit the vector reservation to the user specified mask Suresh Siddha
2012-06-20  5:56                     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-21  9:04                     ` Alexander Gordeev [this message]
2012-06-21 21:51                       ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-20  5:53                   ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, apic: optimize cpu traversal in __assign_irq_vector() using domain membership Yinghai Lu
2012-06-21  8:31                   ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-06-21 21:53                     ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-20  0:18               ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, irq: update irq_cfg domain unless the new affinity is a subset of the current domain Suresh Siddha
2012-06-21 11:00                 ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-06-21 21:58                   ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-22 10:12       ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: x2apic/cluster: Make use of lowest priority delivery mode Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21  8:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-21  9:36   ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21 12:40     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-21 14:48       ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21 14:59         ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-21 15:22           ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21 15:34           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-21 15:36           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-21 18:07             ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-21 18:18               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-21 18:37                 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-21 19:30                   ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-21 19:15             ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-21 19:56               ` Suresh Siddha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120621090451.GD2223@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=agordeev@redhat.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®