mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fields James <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com>
Cc: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
	Morton Andrew <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Harrosh Boaz <bharrosh@panasas.com>,
	"<linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>,
	Vivek Trivedi <t.vivek@samsung.com>,
	Amit Sahrawat <a.sahrawat@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] nfs: Add NFS3PROC_UMOUNT procedure.
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 07:30:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120625113025.GB16920@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKYAXd80v10car7awm3Y5bzk_nXLj8NLi7C8PxUW15L9-S7pEw@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 02:12:49PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> 2012/6/24, Fields James <bfields@fieldses.org>:
> > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:57:10AM -0400, Fields James wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 03:52:20PM +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> >> > The other objection is that NFSv3 already has a way to do this via the
> >> > MOUNT protocol. We already call MOUNTPROC3_UMNT/MOUNTPROC_UMNT on
> >> > unmount of a filesystem.
> >> >
> >> > The problem with this approach is that if the NFS client crashes before
> >> > it can call this function, then the server never gets notified. That is
> >> > a problem that your patch has too...
> >>
> >> Yes.  Could you instead work on describing *exactly* what the original
> >> problem was that prompted this?
> >
> > ("You" here meaning Namjae Jeon, of course).
> >
> > And note here we've all read the changelog, that's not what I'm asking
> > for.
> >
> > I want to know the details of *your* specific case.  "I have X clients
> > that I use for Y, periodically I want to unmount the exported filesystem
> > to do Z, I tried doing W but it didn't work...".
> As you remember, We discussed this
> issue(http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-nfs/msg29997.html) with you
> before. you guided me to use exportfs -f call on nfs server.
> It is hard to use this method on our system

Why is it hard?

Could you hack umount to do the equivalent of "exportfs -f" before
calling the umount?

> and nomally the user is
> thinking it is problem device busy happen after umounting.
> 
> The details of specific case.
> 1. There are two target or two PC. and Client want to access files of
> usb device on server.
> 2. the client try to mount usb mount point using nfs on sever after
> plugging usb device.
> 3. we try to umount mount point directory on client.
> 4. and when we try to umount usb device mount directory server, device
> busy message occured like this (umount: can't umount /mnt: Device or
> resource busy)

Right, so I don't think you want protocol modifications.  They take a
few years to get hammered out and then make it into implementations, and
they won't help a great deal with your problem anyway.  (Because of
problems like the possibility of lost "unmount" calls that Trond
mentions.)

Either modify umount itself to flush the export cache before attempting
the unmount, or if that doesn't work perhaps you could patch the kernel
to notify nfsd on unmount and let it attemt to clear its caches before
deciding whether the filesystem is busy.

--b.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-25 11:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-23 10:46 Namjae Jeon
2012-06-23 15:07 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-06-23 15:52   ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-06-23 15:57     ` Fields James
2012-06-23 16:09       ` Fields James
2012-06-24  5:12         ` Namjae Jeon
2012-06-25 11:30           ` Fields James [this message]
2012-06-26  5:51             ` Namjae Jeon
2012-06-26 11:10               ` Fields James
2012-06-26 11:57                 ` Namjae Jeon
2012-06-23 15:59     ` Chuck Lever
2012-06-24  4:49       ` Namjae Jeon
2012-06-24  4:44     ` Namjae Jeon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120625113025.GB16920@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=a.sahrawat@samsung.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
    --cc=linkinjeon@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namjae.jeon@samsung.com \
    --cc=t.vivek@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®