From: mc@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFS: Go through the LRU list of inode from head
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 03:35:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120626033546.Horde.D-JZIpir309P6WZSsiFCifA@imap.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120621095223.GA11645@quack.suse.cz>
Quoting Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>:
> On Thu 21-06-12 17:00:27, Cong Meng wrote:
>> Go through the LRU list of inode from head.
>>
>> (I'm not sure whether there is any trick here I doesn't get. If yes,
>> any one could explain it)
> Look at inode_lru_list_add(). It adds at the head of the list. So you
> should take from the tail to get the least recently used element...
I still have a quetion about the subsequent code and comment:
inode = list_entry(sb->s_inode_lru.prev, struct inode, i_lru);
/*
* we are inverting the sb->s_inode_lru_lock/inode->i_lock here,
* so use a trylock. If we fail to get the lock, just move the
* inode to the back of the list so we don't spin on it.
*/
if (!spin_trylock(&inode->i_lock)) {
list_move_tail(&inode->i_lru, &sb->s_inode_lru);
continue;
}
Shouldn't the inode be moved to the head to avoid spin on it?
I note that list_move was replaced by list_move_tail purposely in a commit.
and below piece of code (at the bottom of prune_icache_sb()):
if (inode != list_entry(sb->s_inode_lru.next,
struct inode, i_lru))
continue; /* wrong inode or list_empty */
Should the inode be compared against to the tail of the list other
than the head
after re-get the lru lock?
thanks.
cong.
>
> Honza
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cong Meng <mc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> fs/inode.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
>> index 775cbab..aac8449 100644
>> --- a/fs/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/inode.c
>> @@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ void prune_icache_sb(struct super_block *sb,
>> int nr_to_scan)
>> if (list_empty(&sb->s_inode_lru))
>> break;
>>
>> - inode = list_entry(sb->s_inode_lru.prev, struct inode, i_lru);
>> + inode = list_entry(sb->s_inode_lru.next, struct inode, i_lru);
>>
>> /*
>> * we are inverting the sb->s_inode_lru_lock/inode->i_lock here,
>> --
>> 1.7.5.4
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-26 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-21 9:00 Cong Meng
2012-06-21 9:47 ` Wanpeng Li
2012-06-21 9:52 ` Jan Kara
2012-06-26 7:35 ` mc [this message]
2012-06-27 16:08 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120626033546.Horde.D-JZIpir309P6WZSsiFCifA@imap.linux.ibm.com \
--to=mc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®