From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755790Ab2GAO65 (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jul 2012 10:58:57 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:56460 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752081Ab2GAO64 (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jul 2012 10:58:56 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 16:58:53 +0200 From: Heinz Diehl To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Hillf Danton Subject: Re: [RFC patch] BFS: 421-1 Message-ID: <20120701145853.GA22259@fancy-poultry.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: private site OpenPGP: id=898F89DE; url=http://www.fritha.org/htd.asc X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.0.97 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:RUpAzWqR+RLTVl6GIYBWs+xs0AyE6tSYjWVZap8sX8m 17vdV3aVE8lxyGWi8f/P99fr0HylRyvO40ASaDkaTembpG4kdo SxSUO4AF1bVnQ0MDMITN5pwudc8VwlHAi9z1NnIJXzQKp05NaK G+GlD6QJNoVY8oK2e9DXz32q9xeFaY+wWnUvhXF2470UW3XPVm YETDZFpVjoYPWJBrI6ZZMxOKMTPnXp3SbOZkkgkNqIXmAiy8f8 mCwMaFqCZZrzbXmCn7Fy4+vHjr/+qvI9NojO5LV+JGExv6JOzF iY6gqnHdMShi6NYAo/nQisT6py8GRVTmL7frDZ09n+mm/DMPth r3SEHG9LyT8J7f2DM4qBYAae69ksQ0YtuA8hNJ/Wy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01.07.2012, Hillf Danton wrote: > With 15 patches collected, the 421-1 is ready with iso untouched. > Note diff is based not on 420 but on 421. [....] There is no v.421 on ck.kolivas.org, and it seems it never has been, at least there is a patch which updates v.420 directly to v.422 which indicates that there isn't any v.421. So what version is your patchset actually based on? Btw: Con Kolivas released BFS v.422 already some weeks ago, you maybe should think on rebasing your patchset on that one? Confused..