From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki@in.ibm.com>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, hbabu@us.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH] [powerpc] Export memory limit via device tree
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:19:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120702114855.22333.95335.stgit@suzukikp.in.ibm.com> (raw)
The powerpc kernel doesn't export the memory limit enforced by 'mem='
kernel parameter. This is required for building the ELF header in
kexec-tools to limit the vmcore to capture only the used memory. On
powerpc the kexec-tools depends on the device-tree for memory related
information, unlike /proc/iomem on the x86.
Without this information, the kexec-tools assumes the entire System
RAM and vmcore creates an unnecessarily larger dump.
This patch exports the memory limit, if present, via chosen/linux,memory-limit
property, so that the vmcore can be limited to the memory limit.
The prom_init seems to export this value in the same node. But doesn't really
appear there. Also the memory_limit gets adjusted with the processing of
crashkernel= parameter. This patch makes sure we get the actual limit.
The kexec-tools will use the value to limit the 'end' of the memory
regions.
Tested this patch on ppc64 and ppc32(ppc440) with a kexec-tools
patch by Mahesh.
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki@in.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Mahesh J. Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
index c957b12..0c9695d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
@@ -207,6 +207,12 @@ static struct property crashk_size_prop = {
.value = &crashk_size,
};
+static struct property memory_limit_prop = {
+ .name = "linux,memory-limit",
+ .length = sizeof(phys_addr_t),
+ .value = &memory_limit,
+};
+
static void __init export_crashk_values(struct device_node *node)
{
struct property *prop;
@@ -226,6 +232,15 @@ static void __init export_crashk_values(struct device_node *node)
crashk_size = resource_size(&crashk_res);
prom_add_property(node, &crashk_size_prop);
}
+
+ /* memory-limit is needed for constructing the crash regions */
+ prop = of_find_property(node, memory_limit_prop.name, NULL);
+ if (prop)
+ prom_remove_property(node, prop);
+
+ if (memory_limit)
+ prom_add_property(node, &memory_limit_prop);
+
}
static int __init kexec_setup(void)
next reply other threads:[~2012-07-02 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-02 11:49 Suzuki K. Poulose [this message]
2012-07-11 5:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-07-19 8:00 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120702114855.22333.95335.stgit@suzukikp.in.ibm.com \
--to=suzuki@in.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®