From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752685Ab2GBMhr (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2012 08:37:47 -0400 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:45378 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751320Ab2GBMhq (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2012 08:37:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 13:37:40 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: ShuoX Liu , Andrew Morton , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Build failures in -next due to move of disable Message-ID: <20120702123740.GA11168@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Cookie: Murphy was an optimist. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Today's -next is failing to build for me because commit 9f419c (PM / Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle) and commit b32e30 (cpuidle: move field disable from per-driver to per-cpu) disagree about where the disable field should be: CC drivers/base/power/domain.o drivers/base/power/domain.c: In function '__pm_genpd_poweron': drivers/base/power/domain.c:194: error: 'struct cpuidle_state' has no member named 'disable' drivers/base/power/domain.c: In function 'pm_genpd_poweroff': drivers/base/power/domain.c:490: error: 'struct cpuidle_state' has no member named 'disable' drivers/base/power/domain.c: In function 'genpd_attach_cpuidle': drivers/base/power/domain.c:1671: error: 'struct cpuidle_state' has no member named 'disable' drivers/base/power/domain.c: In function 'genpd_detach_cpuidle': drivers/base/power/domain.c:1706: error: 'struct cpuidle_state' has no member named 'disable'