mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf target: Ignore return value of strerror_r() explicitly
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 12:34:26 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120702153426.GC12542@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1341210014-10113-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>

Em Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 03:20:14PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Since glibc 2.16 added the warn_unused_result (wur) attribute
> to the function, we should check the return value or ignore it
> explicitly.
> 
> Reported-by: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>

> +++ b/tools/perf/util/target.c
> @@ -111,7 +111,8 @@ int perf_target__strerror(struct perf_target *target, int errnum,
>  	const char *msg;
>  
>  	if (errnum >= 0) {
> -		strerror_r(errnum, buf, buflen);
> +		/* make glibc (>= 2.16) happy */
> +		(void)strerror_r(errnum, buf, buflen);

Is this really the best way to handle this?

What if some perf tool is buggy and passes an invalid errnum?  Shouldn't
we catch that?

- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-02 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-02  6:20 Namhyung Kim
2012-07-02 15:34 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2012-07-03  0:28   ` Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120702153426.GC12542@infradead.org \
    --to=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®