From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932601Ab2GBTtF (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:49:05 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([193.178.161.156]:49662 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753291Ab2GBTtC (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:49:02 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Mark Brown Subject: Re: Build failures in -next due to move of disable Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 21:54:35 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/3.5.0-rc5+; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: ShuoX Liu , Andrew Morton , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20120702123740.GA11168@sirena.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20120702123740.GA11168@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201207022154.35327.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, July 02, 2012, Mark Brown wrote: > Today's -next is failing to build for me because commit 9f419c (PM / > Domains: Add preliminary support for cpuidle) and commit b32e30 > (cpuidle: move field disable from per-driver to per-cpu) disagree about > where the disable field should be: Hmm, do you know what tree commit b32e30 comes from? Rafael > > CC drivers/base/power/domain.o > drivers/base/power/domain.c: In function '__pm_genpd_poweron': > drivers/base/power/domain.c:194: error: 'struct cpuidle_state' has no member named 'disable' > drivers/base/power/domain.c: In function 'pm_genpd_poweroff': > drivers/base/power/domain.c:490: error: 'struct cpuidle_state' has no member named 'disable' > drivers/base/power/domain.c: In function 'genpd_attach_cpuidle': > drivers/base/power/domain.c:1671: error: 'struct cpuidle_state' has no member named 'disable' > drivers/base/power/domain.c: In function 'genpd_detach_cpuidle': > drivers/base/power/domain.c:1706: error: 'struct cpuidle_state' has no member named 'disable' > >