From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754168Ab2GCKBE (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2012 06:01:04 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:54128 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751981Ab2GCKBB (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2012 06:01:01 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 12:00:49 +0200 From: Thierry Reding To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sascha Hauer Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pwm tree related) Message-ID: <20120703100049.GA8455@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de> References: <20120629174826.546cc991459b12833f2aaebd@canb.auug.org.au> <201207030806.49561.arnd.bergmann@linaro.org> <20120703081138.GA25183@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de> <201207030859.11975.arnd.bergmann@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201207030859.11975.arnd.bergmann@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:Hi97pPlE00/rkwqi0Ag4N68Q+IxrzYeMMjnSrwrD73m LKXaupF2IEaJ+MndZRmh/trR6THa5SauPa/jW1MFrImu03jYeV II7GTaphkwF2tiQ5l5yrK4+3/xwVcirf19L9SlpPXAECKuLsU+ MxbzRT958T4RG307I8xLVcajsZgNNGiZ4sfQ3jOmx54UiQ6l+3 0kI0hC2MLTtxgO3QA5+FLD23TwpcwthY1FHGXzYjHlL3frEqd/ yfxKK+gaOVZ2Vxk9ejwJp6Ix1jxqz6TYOZ6XOIZmzMUeKG8ijO y83xrTo5zb143VynCIgZ99v1+AiBKlrNyk0TwATseqn2mS53L1 8lTIZennnekHjChJC+fnrSEcDz3xohwRD9Kh0Abq5tEDtX54g6 tGZu2gSq9zMoigFh/b0qlw9kUBMDXiCgEI= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 08:59:11AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 03 July 2012, Thierry Reding wrote: > > I came up with the attached patch. What do you think? It fixes the > > PowerPC allyesconfig issue for me. >=20 > This one looks correct, but I would still do it the other way around, > putting the depends statements into the locations of the other drivers. > The main difference is that we can then independently convert the > remaining drivers, without having merge conflicts in the same line > every time we remove one of the dependencies. The downside of that approach, however, is to make PWM override other settings. For instance if you have TWL6030_PWM selected and then decide to also select PWM, then the former will be automatically deselected to satisfy the dependency. I'm not sure if that's desired. Thierry --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJP8sLRAAoJEN0jrNd/PrOhfnsP/jhU4fXJpS831+3XsUGoyFHk xsfSqbT73oWrxao+hv/i3Ni8zS7o6DGR72bllYTzK6XUcVNJz8ibPW3R4EWTsKlX OTyR6s7KYixP0+iz/Yx0vPoOPmzED6OZIgUmC88/60ykFdzSv3/aHIP0F7aYDK5/ 9OqvvrC2Tagkm1sEzLSUm10i7KKaCvZ7YFJzy3AvcRl3Kz3v2zZVPDmAbKZmgj9c y1NC0IE/2S9uqHhrnDFiqv4Gp6kRrDi3rEy1zuV8EfSlNATFdzZMvUFpbGx//Fql U14CsS8K9DqdjlePnwMv4V+IiUokdq3jomoWSs325eI6sX9rNaGDiR/5lkZjzjbP lI585Vrh04Oh25EVqn3mjXkN5qff1hG8TSpApKW0weX3e+j9HFAcbX1M2gIv+aGq gPhR/rLrPtMn7w/7VVHEGHaDhKI76hH/Z1o9dKcieLilKSpZ6JF+E2Aj2nO8IKn0 FTE57cQKMCCPurt+kaMqh6zMPS9JL3qo97n0cvAJ1O/quZ4m56Ns4mID0pRxMxz8 QOFr8cKKpCQBaXBSD8NIg2fYDA0huOJD7mgijeTih5X1tlKFQoiW8O64PpMBTe7T j9+pFIKh5TyaRfKNjpCAjWNvo1AeBhOI1/UHoyi5iEzE8/9yQGxbeqO+gqa8hiw9 Bvcmr+kUKIT5hN1n9snq =FN0x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR--