From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756232Ab2GCU4s (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2012 16:56:48 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([193.178.161.156]:51664 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752673Ab2GCU4r (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2012 16:56:47 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Linux PM list Subject: [RFD] PM: Device tree representation of power domains Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 23:02:17 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/3.5.0-rc5+; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: LKML , Matthew Garrett , Magnus Damm , Arnd Bergmann , Mark Brown , Grant Likely MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201207032302.17805.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, I actually don't have any ideas how to do that at the moment, but I wonder if anyone has already thought about it? For one, I don't think that representing a power domain as a platform device would be a good approach and I'm not sure how to represent the relationships between devices and the domains they belong to. Thoughts? Rafael