From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754146Ab2GEI6p (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 5 Jul 2012 04:58:45 -0400
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:54718 "EHLO
	shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750720Ab2GEI6o (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 5 Jul 2012 04:58:44 -0400
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 01:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20120705.015841.2231353345763821829.davem@davemloft.net>
To: gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        nhorman@tuxdriver.com, tj@kernel.org, lizefan@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: fix panic in netprio_cgroup
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <1341477102-16988-1-git-send-email-gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
References: <1341477102-16988-1-git-send-email-gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.0.97 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


Why did you post this twice?

Is there a difference between the first patch and the second
one you posted?  If so, what is that difference?