On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 01:57:06PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> The non-DT path for this is a huge mess, I'd rather focus on making
> it obsolete than trying to fix it. Other than that, I agree that
> we should be registering the ab8500 from the prcmu from both the
> DT and the non-DT case.

If that's the decision then we should probably have a comment in the
code saying that this is what's going on to warn off anyone who's
inclined to cut'n'paste.