From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Jukka Ollila <jiiksteri@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kay@vrfy.org, jbeulich@novell.com,
greg@kroah.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Regression - /proc/kmsg does not (always) block for 1-byte reads
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 20:38:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120706203825.20ce3e47@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGoecWyMKF4gC7FaoBCrBs+rD=u6oJRHS5Q2qVkkwoZZ1_4RCg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012 20:45:44 +0300
Jukka Ollila <jiiksteri@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A few days ago I filed a kernel regression report concerning a change
> in /proc/kmsg behaviour with short reads:
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44211
>
> The comments suggest that this is probably intentional, but that it
> would be best make sure that the current semantics wrt short reads are
> as intended.
>
> The problem appears on a Debian (unstable) system that drains
> /proc/kmsg into a separate fifo read by klogd(8):
>
> /bin/dd bs=1 if=/proc/kmsg of=/var/run/klogd/kmsg
>
> With the recent kernel logging changes this /bin/dd exits immediately,
> as 1-byte reads are shorter than any log message could possibly be and
> read() returns 0. No dd feeding the fifo results in no logging and a
> rather unhappy klogd on the reading end of /var/run/klogd/kmsg.
>
> I suppose a safe solution is to only do reads that are big enough for
> any single kernel message, but this is still a change that affects
> user space being shipped, so some might find it surprising.
>
> I don't know what other distros do. Is it just Debian being the odd one out?
If this is observed on an actual standard distro userspace and breaks it
then its a regression and it needs fixing or reverting.
Cc'ing Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-06 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-06 17:45 Bug 44211 " Jukka Ollila
2012-07-06 17:55 ` Greg KH
2012-07-06 18:46 ` Jukka Ollila
2012-07-08 12:37 ` Kay Sievers
2012-07-08 12:59 ` Alan Cox
2012-07-08 13:06 ` Kay Sievers
2012-07-06 19:38 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2012-07-06 20:30 ` Regression " Linus Torvalds
2012-07-07 21:19 ` Kay Sievers
2012-07-08 2:09 ` Kay Sievers
2012-08-10 12:56 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-07-06 22:05 ` Jukka Ollila
2012-07-06 22:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-07-08 0:33 ` Kay Sievers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120706203825.20ce3e47@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=jiiksteri@gmail.com \
--cc=kay@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®