From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752294Ab2GHQDi (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jul 2012 12:03:38 -0400 Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.50]:38801 "EHLO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752165Ab2GHQDh (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jul 2012 12:03:37 -0400 Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:03:12 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Paul Bolle Cc: Russell King , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: remove asm/locks.h Message-ID: <20120708160258.GC27030@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1341262188.1911.147.camel@x61.thuisdomein> <20120702215203.GA25234@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <1341300030.1911.179.camel@x61.thuisdomein> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1341300030.1911.179.camel@x61.thuisdomein> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 08:20:30AM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 22:52 +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > Not sure I follow, but since this is all dead code I can't see any tests > > failing without it. > > The purpose of that disclaimer is to stress that only git commands were > used to determine that removing this header is correct and safe. But > perhaps saying that I therefore "tested" this patch with git commands is > confusing. Okey doke. Please can you put this into the patch system? Cheers, Will