From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752283Ab2GHTw6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jul 2012 15:52:58 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:45315 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751938Ab2GHTw5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jul 2012 15:52:57 -0400 Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 21:52:46 +0200 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= To: Fabio Estevam Cc: Philippe Reynes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add nand platform on imx27 devicetree Message-ID: <20120708195246.GF4687@pengutronix.de> References: <1341764963-11402-1-git-send-email-tremyfr@yahoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:21e:67ff:fe11:9c5c X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ukl@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 01:57:37PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Philippe Reynes wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Reynes > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig | 1 + > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig > > index eff4db5..565422b 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig > > @@ -381,6 +381,7 @@ config MACH_IMX27_DT > > bool "Support i.MX27 platforms from device tree" > > select SOC_IMX27 > > select USE_OF > > + select IMX_HAVE_PLATFORM_MXC_NAND > > Bu doing this you end up selecting unnecessary code for dt. > > I proposed a fix for this already: > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/168645/ I only know understood your explaination why you don't want this patch instead. So ok, I prefer your patch, too. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |