From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754052Ab2GIVK6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jul 2012 17:10:58 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:59200 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753791Ab2GIVK4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jul 2012 17:10:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 14:10:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20120709.141055.2204523729214009350.davem@davemloft.net> To: romieu@fr.zoreil.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hayeswang@realtek.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] r8169: support RTL8106E From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20120709101215.GA6530@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> References: <20120706152006.GA6981@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20120708.234857.1032244145219683435.davem@davemloft.net> <20120709101215.GA6530@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.0.97 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Francois Romieu Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:12:15 +0200 > David Miller : >> Francois, what would you like me to do with these two patches? I >> haven't seen full ACKs from you yet. > > You have two options: > - You can apply the first (8106) patch. I tested it. I'm ok with Hayes point. > Consider it Acked. > - You wait for a pull request with both patches + the incremental bits for > the second one. Some of the incremental bits are needed in the original > patch itself while some make more sense before the patch itself. > ETA: this evening or tomorrow morning at worst. > > If you go for the first option, I'll simply skip the first patch and > apply again. It's the same work for me. I'll simply wait for your pull request, thank you.