mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Subject: [PATCH] PM / Runtime: Do not increment device usage counts before probing
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:51:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201207121151.48819.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

The pm_runtime_get_noresume() calls before really_probe() and
before executing __device_attach() for each driver on the
device's bus cause problems to happen if probing fails and if the
driver has enabled runtime PM for the device in its .probe()
callback.  Namely, in that case, if the device has been resumed
by the driver after enabling its runtime PM and if it turns out that
.probe() should return an error, the driver is supposed to suspend
the device and disable its runtime PM before exiting .probe().
However, because the device's runtime PM usage counter was
incremented by the core before calling .probe(), the driver's attempt
to suspend the device will not succeed and the device will remain in
the full-power state after the failing .probe() has returned.

To fix this issue, remove the pm_runtime_get_noresume() calls from
driver_probe_device() and from device_attach() and replace the
corresponding pm_runtime_put_sync() calls with pm_runtime_idle()
to preserve the existing behavior (which is to check if the device
is idle and to suspend it eventually in that case after probing).

Reported-and-tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
 drivers/base/dd.c |    6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Index: linux/drivers/base/dd.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/base/dd.c
+++ linux/drivers/base/dd.c
@@ -356,10 +356,9 @@ int driver_probe_device(struct device_dr
 	pr_debug("bus: '%s': %s: matched device %s with driver %s\n",
 		 drv->bus->name, __func__, dev_name(dev), drv->name);
 
-	pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);
 	pm_runtime_barrier(dev);
 	ret = really_probe(dev, drv);
-	pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
+	pm_runtime_idle(dev);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -406,9 +405,8 @@ int device_attach(struct device *dev)
 			ret = 0;
 		}
 	} else {
-		pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);
 		ret = bus_for_each_drv(dev->bus, NULL, dev, __device_attach);
-		pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
+		pm_runtime_idle(dev);
 	}
 out_unlock:
 	device_unlock(dev);

                 reply	other threads:[~2012-07-12  9:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201207121151.48819.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®