From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759171Ab2GLKMO (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2012 06:12:14 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([193.178.161.156]:37286 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759108Ab2GLKMK (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2012 06:12:10 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] PM / I2C: Convert platform I2C drivers to PM handling based on struct dev_pm_ops Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 12:17:44 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/3.5.0-rc5+; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: LKML , Linux PM list , Linus Walleij , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Sonic Zhang , Jean Delvare , Ben Dooks , Peter Korsgaard , Guan Xuetao , Vitaly Wool , Colin Cross , Stephen Warren References: <201207112121.11046.rjw@sisk.pl> <20120712100901.GE27520@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20120712100901.GE27520@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201207121217.44910.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, July 12, 2012, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:21:10PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > As per > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133996733422413&w=4 > > > > the following patches convert some platform I2C controller drivers to the PM > > handling based on struct dev_pm_ops: > > > > [1/7] i2c-at91: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management > > [2/7] i2c-bfin-twi: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management > > [3/7] i2c-ocores: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management > > [4/7] i2c-pnx: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management > > [5/7] i2c-puv3: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management > > [6/7] i2c-stu300: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management > > [7/7] i2c-tegra: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management > > > > I'd like to include them into my PM pull request for 3.6 if there are no > > objections. > > The changes are fine by me. I'd like to pull them in via I2C, though, > since they are changing mostly drivers for which I have other patches in > the pile and I'd like to see the conflicts myself. Is that okay? They'd > be in linux-next tomorrow. Cool, thanks for handling them! :-) > Or is there a dependency I missed? No, there shouldn't be any. Thanks, Rafael